| Forum » Suggestions » Suggestions on curbing Inflation | Date | |
|---|---|---|
|
Username
6256 msgs.
Golden Ball
|
I'd just kinda say, that would be too complicated for even a lot of long term managers, need more simplicity since you're even including div 5 and 6. | 06/03/2012 20:05 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
27 msgs.
Child's coach
|
the following measures can be used to curb inflation in this game The BANK: reduce the amount of interest deposits earn at the bank, that interest rate is way too high. that figure should be between 0.75% to 1.5% increase the cost of borrowing from the bank that figure should be around 9% to 12%. TAXATION: introduce a PAYE Tax (Pay As You Earn). this will be a tax on income received from the sale of a player. this tax can operate on a structured system. like this, - leagues 6 & 7 will pay no PAYE Tax - leagues 1,2,3,4 & 5 will pay taxes on all players sold. if done correctly, a team that sell a player for 600 million could pay almost 1/4 to 1/3 or even more in taxes. i can assist in providing calculations if needed  |
07/03/2012 01:51 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
47 msgs.
Child's coach
|
anmol3 said: make it mandatory for all teams in group 6 and above to build a school.......................eg minimum 1 for grp 6, 2 for group 5 and so on...............this would lead to an influx of juniors and thus lower prices... further elaborations if everyone has an excellent school then they wont pay 15 million for a player of an avg which they already have.................also by keeping the junior squad fixed at 25, managers will be forced to auction juniors and sell them to induct new players from the school.....thus they would automatically put a lower auction price......... |
08/03/2012 06:29 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
91 msgs.
Rookie
|
can the forum be improved in the nearby future? i dont think i have tho tell what can be improved  but i will give one i want to know how CDF and DFM compare to each other. so i type 'CDF DFM' Zero results. Only CDF or only DFM? Zero results. Edited by Dutch Rovers 08-03-2012 19:08 |
08/03/2012 19:07 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
6256 msgs.
Golden Ball
|
Edited by @grantis45 14-04-2012 13:53 |
08/03/2012 19:56 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
4993 msgs.
Best scorer
|
been a while since i looked at this. i have one final suggestion which has already been raised but should be easy to implement & would have an obvious effect. i signed my most valuable players for free a few months ago. similar players now are selling for over 40m on the market. Please increase the amount of 85-99 prog youth. both from schools and also as unsigned juniors. thanks |
14/04/2012 13:37 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
1399 msgs.
International
|
i think following points have 2 b done 2 rein in inflation:- 1)after buying a player one should b allowed 2 increase his salary by a limited % only. 2)atleast normal quality school cumpulsory fr div 4, quality increasing with increase in division. 3)decrease rate of school. |
16/04/2012 18:14 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Fiscal
3449 msgs.
Best scorer
|
I've only just seen this thread and I read through it briefly, and I think the biggest issue with the market is the fact that there is a rough line where player prices go from reasonable to unreasonable. At about the 40-46 level for midfielders and defenders, and about 40 for forwards you can build a team pretty easily for about $5m each, but as soon as you go above that level you start getting into crazy numbers. If you want any player at about 35-40 average you can basically pay peanuts for an entire squad of players. Excellent news if you're in division 6 and looking to build your team, but worthless otherwise. For example looking at the similar transactions for a 25 year old IM at average 49 (average shown is 46-50) the average auction price is about $6 million, but if you want a 25 year old with an average at 53 (averages in the rage are 52-55), you're paying more like $10 million. So if a team wants to upgrade a position they're paying almost double for a player that's about 4 points better. There seems to be a plateau for IM's between about 53-59 where you're paying about $10-16 million for a 25 year old, but there also appears there aren't as many of them on the market at that price as the similar transactions go back as far as July for 25 year old IM's at 59 average. The bottom line is that there are too few good players on the market, and the only viable long term solution seems to be releasing good quality players via system bot. Not only do you get some cash out of the game, you also give teams a better chance to improve. Now obviously just unleashing a bunch of players on the market is only going to mess the market up and either make money worthless, or make it so there isn't any competitive balance. But a slow trickle would presumably work to help the market. If you're able to find a reasonable price range that developers/admins can figure out for each position and try to consistently keep the market at that price, then I think the market can stabilize over time. For example, if you have roughly set market prices for IM's at $3M for 40 av. $5m for 45 av. $7M for 50 av. and so on, and then you notice the market starts trending higher than those prices, you can drop a few IM's at the rough range you want to stabilize, the market should even back out. Especially since the market in SM truly is a trickle down economy, since once you get a better player at a position, you'll usually want to sell your player with a lower average at that position to recoup some of your cash you just spent. Now this does nothing to address the fact that people will pay absurd amounts of money for 16 year olds with 99 forecasts, but it would help reduce inflation, and wouldn't really hurt older players or new players. |
16/04/2012 20:11 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
6256 msgs.
Golden Ball
|
super striker king said: i think following points have 2 b done 2 rein in inflation:- 1)after buying a player one should b allowed 2 increase his salary by a limited % only. 2)atleast normal quality school cumpulsory fr div 4, quality increasing with increase in division. 3)decrease rate of school. 1) would make it impossible to keep players, it doesn't affect inflation in any way shape or form. You have players ping ponging around from place to place. 2) Once again doesn't help inflation normal schools produce players that in the main no one wants. 3) Less juniors = less good juniors = higher inflation. |
16/04/2012 20:18 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
6256 msgs.
Golden Ball
|
aleph44 said: been a while since i looked at this. i have one final suggestion which has already been raised but should be easy to implement & would have an obvious effect. i signed my most valuable players for free a few months ago. similar players now are selling for over 40m on the market. Please increase the amount of 85-99 prog youth. both from schools and also as unsigned juniors. thanks This is one of the best ways of curbing inflation. |
16/04/2012 20:20 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
14
