| Forum » General » longer player career or higher progression? | Date | |
|---|---|---|
|
Fast progression and short player life, or Slow progression and long player life?
|
||
|
Username
1 msgs.
Ball boy
|
ca va | 12/10/2011 04:48 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
2108 msgs.
Best scorer
|
Ca va bien merci, mais parlez anglais, s'il vous plait. finally learning French comes in handy here, so many Spanish and Portuguese speakers who refused to speak english  |
12/10/2011 04:51 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
3547 msgs.
Best scorer
|
hewhoamareismyself said: Ca va bien merci, mais parlez anglais, s'il vous plait. finally learning French comes in handy here, so many Spanish and Portuguese speakers who refused to speak english Refuse to speak English , so that's why i haven't seen them in a while |
12/10/2011 04:53 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
797 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
@CelloG said: what do you mean? Your players are training at pretty high levels, the trainings you did (Running and Penalty Shots, I'm guessing?) aren't super-high training, except for RF/LF, but they were already at very high average. Look at your junior CF, his leadership improved 1.6! I will try other trainings as well. Maybe I will get higher results. I'm not totally convinced yet, but hopefully it's fixed now. It would be nice to have a "masterplan" for training, which points out the exact benefits of every training for every position. So far I'm still in the phase of "try and error". So don't take my complaint too serious at this point. |
12/10/2011 04:54 |
| Union RS Marburg - Div3/Gr9 | ||
|
Username
5569 msgs.
Golden Ball
|
we all are.... make sure you write it down somewhere....cuz I don't.... Now i'm scratching my head, cuz I can't remember today's training.... |
12/10/2011 05:01 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
301 msgs.
First-team player
|
@rebsiot said: I saw .444 on a defenseman, .508 on a back, .454 on a GK .246 on a RF .344 on a CF .344 on an RM .226 on a LW This was checking only the 10 teams I am currently a fan of. That's pretty significant rates of training. I think it might even be faster than last season for a CF or RM. ? mine didn't improve more than 0.058.... |
12/10/2011 05:47 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
5569 msgs.
Golden Ball
|
check your training type, coach % and figure player progression and motivation.... then his average needs to be lower to get higher training numbers... like below 40 for highest numbers. |
12/10/2011 06:00 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
1237 msgs.
International
|
Perdy4 said: @rebsiot said: I saw .444 on a defenseman, .508 on a back, .454 on a GK .246 on a RF .344 on a CF .344 on an RM .226 on a LW This was checking only the 10 teams I am currently a fan of. That's pretty significant rates of training. I think it might even be faster than last season for a CF or RM. ? mine didn't improve more than 0.058.... low progression i guess more more more |
12/10/2011 07:30 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
223 msgs.
Substitute
|
woohoo? progression has gone up from ~1/10 of last season to 1/3. So much for parity before the current crop of 60+ players get red arrow disease in seven seasons, so ~2 yrs. | 12/10/2011 08:25 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
59 msgs.
Rookie
|
Training is better , but too low for mixed training to ever be effective. So I guess I just train one third of my squad and let the others stagnate. I get no satisfaction from that. |
12/10/2011 10:10 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
15
