Go to page 1, 2, 3
  Forum » Suggestions » Specialized School Date
Username
9897 msgs.
Golden Ball
People don't really care about cost, they just want to get what they need and what can satisfy them. 22/07/2012 20:31
  - Div/Gr
Username
356 msgs.
First-team player
Whatamidoinghere said:
People don't really care about cost, they just want to get what they need and what can satisfy them.

So what's wrong if some one wants to train a certain position player.
this would be a tricky actually. it's all about senior team in SM. if some 1 train only GK, or def it won't help him much in long run. u need good players in all position to make a good team. they have to buy players of other positions to make a good team.
22/07/2012 20:41
  - Div/Gr
Fiscal
3449 msgs.
Best scorer
bublai said:
Whatamidoinghere said:
People don't really care about cost, they just want to get what they need and what can satisfy them.

So what's wrong if some one wants to train a certain position player.
this would be a tricky actually. it's all about senior team in SM. if some 1 train only GK, or def it won't help him much in long run. u need good players in all position to make a good team. they have to buy players of other positions to make a good team.


How is only training 1 position not going to help someone? If I've got 20 99 FC CDF's that I've trained up to 90+ average I can sell them for millions or trade them for other 90+ average players.

In theory it's a good idea, but all it would really end up doing is giving the top teams 25 99 FC/99 Prog juniors in the positions they want, allowing them to craft the best teams with little effort. The current school strategy at least requires a little strategy to work with.
22/07/2012 21:27
  - Div/Gr
Username
356 msgs.
First-team player
Obviously it will help.
now if you have money and invest them intelligently no harm in that. and what I am saying this would be completely optional. if some one trains for every position he don't need to invest further. if you train only mid fielders you need to sell one or more players to buy 1 good CF or GK and vice versa.
it would be optional and need some business mind and tactics to get benefited from it. SM is not only about playing and winning a game. it's more of a business and managerial game and that s what makes it more interesting.
I repeat it again, this feature, if it is implemented at all will be an optional and will require some brain works of the managers which is always good for the game.
22/07/2012 21:48
  - Div/Gr
Username
356 msgs.
First-team player
@ illex
And bdw how many 99fc,99prog youngs you have got from your schools ?
i have 5 excellent schools. 3 of them are in Brazil, Argentina and Netherlands . and have them since last 2 and half seasons.
maxm prog player I have got is 91 and the average is 75 prog.

when you are talking about something in a public forum, it is always a good practice to talk with some valid data points. else it is obvious that your post will be taken as lightly .

Edited by bublai 22-07-2012 22:09
22/07/2012 22:07
  - Div/Gr
3168 msgs.
Best scorer
beachbernie said:
Don't like the idea. It would make farming players way to easy and turn farms into factories.


I agree. This suggestion is not possible to implement in my opinion.
22/07/2012 23:51
  - Div/Gr
Fiscal
3449 msgs.
Best scorer
I don't see how it's going to take more brainpower to do. All you do is set all your schools to a specific position and wait for the money players to come.

As it is right now you get a 90+ prog junior in a position you don't train, you've got to figure out what the best thing to do with it is. Do you sell it? and to who? or do you trade it to get one in a position you do train? All you would do with your system is ask yourself if this guy you just got is better than a player you have now, or if you could sell him. That's it.

You're right, 99 prog players are incredibly rare, so let's take my original statement and modify it slightly

In theory it's a good idea, but all it would really end up doing is giving the top teams 25 90 FC/99 Prog juniors in the positions they want, allowing them to craft the best teams with little effort. The current school strategy at least requires a little strategy to work with.


you're still going to run into the same issue, load up all 40 of your schools as forward producing, and just collect the best forwards as you can, tossing aside the ones you don't need till you've got a ton of amazing 14 year olds.

The bigger issue is that things in SM can follow trends, right now defenders are really popular to train, a few seasons ago it was forwards. The thing we have right now is that the market is is roughly full of equal parts of each position, so due to supply and demand, you're seeing roughly equal amounts of people training positions. If you can pick what you can train, and everyone grabs a squad full of defenders to train and very few people pick the other positions it could be a disaster. Suddenly there is nothing but defenders in the 50+ average player market, and an 80 average defender sells for as much as a 50 average forward, and an 80 average forward sells for 2 billion. You've got some extreme inequality going on in the market and some crazy inflation going on with every other position.

Also, if you would like to say passive aggressive things to me, please feel free to send them to me via PM, it's just easier that way.
22/07/2012 23:58
  - Div/Gr
Username
21587 msgs.
Golden Ball
@Dnsvnsk said:
beachbernie said:
Don't like the idea. It would make farming players way to easy and turn farms into factories.


i agree too! Not possible,if,i will just build a holland school and put it to CFs only
23/07/2012 02:41
  🦊3773™ - Div2/Gr1
Username
356 msgs.
First-team player
Look, you can't field more than 1 GK, 6 defs, 6 mids and 5 forwards. it will show invalid formation then. or you have to play players out of position which will hurt their motivation and hence the growth.
so you can't field or train players only from your specialized school . you must field other players too.
23/07/2012 06:11
  - Div/Gr
Username
356 msgs.
First-team player
You need to strategy which school you want to assign to which specialization.
you must have an excellent school then only you will be able to specialize it and it will have the initial construction cost and added weekly cost.
suppose I upgrade a Brazil school to GK specialist. it will produce a GK each 5 days . but I won't be able to train them as I can field only 1.
so this feature requires strategy and some vision so that would be helpful , not a boomerang.
23/07/2012 06:22
  - Div/Gr
     
Go to page 1, 2, 3
2