| Forum » Suggestions » New countries on schools | Date | |
|---|---|---|
|
Username
485 msgs.
First-team player
|
Some of you are probably familiar with my campaigning for new schools in countries which are not yet on the schools map. I noticed hupholland had an impressive thread on school suggestions which was coming back to life earlier this year before tragically being closed. Here is the link to that thread if you want to see some of the ideas that have been put down already: http://uk.strikermanager.com/foros/hilo.php?id=273644 I would like this thread to be open for as long as possible so people can add their own suggestions to the discussion. First of all, I want to focus more towards Asia and that way. Here on SM we have many who live in Asia/Middle East whose countries are not represented on SM. Lets start off with a few suggestions. India (20%) sorry akhil!  Pakistan (20%) Turkey (60%) May need a seperate map since it is not shown on Asia Israel (30-40%) May need a seperate map since it is not shown on Asia Armenia (10-20%) Difficult country, some say it is in Europe, others say it is in Asia. Geographically it is south of the Caucuses meaning Asian, but it is up for debate. North Korea (30-40%) Well, they were in the 2010 world cup! I will leave the rest for those who know the region better/ have the time and patience to put the rest down  Now, let's get to Europe. We seriously need to add quite a few countries here! Wales (40%) Serbia (60%) Estonia (20%) Latvia (20%) Lithuania (20%) San Marino (10%) *hupholland suggestion* (may eventually be dropped from the list) (ok, it's becoming a joke )Slovakia (40-60%) can't make my mind up Slovenia (60%) (@Horath suggested 60%) Hungary (60-70%) was 40%, but themadhatter thought 60-70% was better Romania (40%) Andorra (10-20%) Georgia (10-20%) It is considered as being in Europe Belgium (70-80%) Norway (50%) Finland (20-30%) Iceland (20-30%) If you have another country to add, or want to change a rating of a country, put it down as a suggestion!! Ok, Africa is next. Two major suggestions, the rest you guys can contribute Morroco (20-40%) (hupholland said 50% but I think 20-40% may be more realistic) South Africa (70%) HOW DID THEY MISS SOUTH AFRICA OUT IN AFRICA?! MADNESS!! Senegal (60%) (kkii567 recommendation) North America Jamaica (40%) (Xianne) Cuba (20%) Good ol' Fidel  Any other countries on continents you want down, write it down Edited by fenomeno99 09-06-2012 00:10 Edited by fenomeno99 09-06-2012 23:06 Edited by fenomeno99 10-06-2012 23:17 Edited by fenomeno99 12-06-2012 19:29 Edited by fenomeno99 13-06-2012 23:24 Edited by fenomeno99 15-06-2012 23:33 Edited by fenomeno99 02-07-2012 12:07 |
08/06/2012 12:53 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
1184 msgs.
International
|
how did you get czech republic at a lower level than poland? plenty more big stars from the republic than poland czech 60% poland 30% Edited by LeNick 08-06-2012 13:10 |
08/06/2012 12:59 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
485 msgs.
First-team player
|
put a rating suggestion down for the two countries and let's see what everyone else says. | 08/06/2012 13:01 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
7 msgs.
Cadet
|
it's useless to add San Marino schools there in SM | 08/06/2012 13:49 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
3547 msgs.
Best scorer
|
Poland > Serbia and Denmark !? wtf haha |
08/06/2012 14:03 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
485 msgs.
First-team player
|
Maybe, but I do know that San Marino has a national team which causes surprises now and then |
08/06/2012 14:48 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
485 msgs.
First-team player
|
Uruguay1950 said: Poland > Serbia and Denmark !? wtf haha haha ok Uru, tell me what ratings you would give Poland, Serbia and Denmark |
08/06/2012 14:49 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Fiscal
3449 msgs.
Best scorer
|
fenomeno99 said: Maybe, but I do know that San Marino has a national team which causes surprises now and then San Marino has never caused a single surprise, they've only won 1 match...ever. San Marino has only ever had like 3 players that have ever played in any top flight, and even then only like 1-2 have ever been any good, plus it's such a small country that you'd be getting players like once every 3 weeks. At least with somewhere like Austria (20% school) there are actually some real life players that have done things. I think it'd be even hard to give it a 5% rating, much less 10%. Not to be all debbie downer, but do we really need any new schools right now? At the moment there is a school for almost every price range and every player quality. I understand it's cool to have your home country's players getting produced, but for most people it's probably a waste of money (who would want to dump a bunch of money into a 20% school that will maybe produce 1 player a season worth anything? At a time where the devs have clearly caused a major problem with yesterday's downtime. I'm sure a school is just some copy/paste and alter a few values, so it's not that hard, but when uplay is having a hard time controlling the basic features of the game, it seems dangerous to ask for a bunch of new things for them to mess up. |
08/06/2012 16:43 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
485 msgs.
First-team player
|
illex said: fenomeno99 said: Maybe, but I do know that San Marino has a national team which causes surprises now and then San Marino has never caused a single surprise, they've only won 1 match...ever. San Marino has only ever had like 3 players that have ever played in any top flight, and even then only like 1-2 have ever been any good, plus it's such a small country that you'd be getting players like once every 3 weeks. At least with somewhere like Austria (20% school) there are actually some real life players that have done things. I think it'd be even hard to give it a 5% rating, much less 10%. Not to be all debbie downer, but do we really need any new schools right now? At the moment there is a school for almost every price range and every player quality. I understand it's cool to have your home country's players getting produced, but for most people it's probably a waste of money (who would want to dump a bunch of money into a 20% school that will maybe produce 1 player a season worth anything? At a time where the devs have clearly caused a major problem with yesterday's downtime. I'm sure a school is just some copy/paste and alter a few values, so it's not that hard, but when uplay is having a hard time controlling the basic features of the game, it seems dangerous to ask for a bunch of new things for them to mess up. Actually they have caused a single surprise: they scored the fastest goal ever, here is the goal: San Marino is in the balance, it most likely will be dropped when the time comes to add new countries to the schools. As for the rest of your argument, there are two sides to it. Yes It can be a waste of time and money to some, but for others it is different. People do like to see their own countries have a spot on the schools map and this helps attract more people to SM. Also there are some countries that have produced exceptional players that are not on schools e.g. Denmark (Peter Schmeichel), Wales (Ryan Giggs) and so on. This is not a short term project, this is here for the long term. I'm sure many managers would agree that having more countries on the schools map would be a great idea. |
08/06/2012 17:23 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
5633 msgs.
Golden Ball
|
I think Greece would be a good addition. They have a reasonably strong football history and there is a decent sized Greek contingent who play this game. I would like to see European schools added for the euros the same as South American Schools were added for the Copa America. I would also like to see some schools updated. I'm fairly sure most people will agree that Spain should be a 100% school, and I think this would be the perfect time to update it should more euro schools be added |
08/06/2012 17:27 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
1
