| Forum » Suggestions » Trainings and other suggestions | Date | |
|---|---|---|
|
76 msgs.
Rookie
|
@rebsiot,gunneric,bluegene. I hope you will surport this ideal. Becose we all want this game to be realistic even though it can never be 100% but we should be bold of 70% reality. Though am rookie in time of games am good. 1. There should be a goalkeeper trainer among our staff. 2. Players forecast in a team should be visible to the manager without goldenball. 3. Traing schedule should be twice per day, morning and evening. 4. Transfers should be done twice in a season. |
01/11/2011 19:54 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
3363 msgs.
Best scorer
|
I understand the need to be realistic but a fun addictive game > realism. I suggest you get into the game a bit more and understand its workings and you will be pleasantly surprised - you may enjoy it just the way it is.  |
01/11/2011 20:23 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
4257 msgs.
Best scorer
|
Farias miguel said: @rebsiot,gunneric,bluegene. I hope you will surport this ideal. Becose we all want this game to be realistic even though it can never be 100% but we should be bold of 70% reality. Though am rookie in time of games am good. 1. There shouldn't be a goalkeeper trainer among our staff. 2. Players forecast in a team shouldn't be visible to the manager without goldenball. 3. Traing schedule shouldn't be twice per day, morning and evening. 4. Transfers shouldn't be done twice in a season. +1 |
01/11/2011 21:51 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
2108 msgs.
Best scorer
|
All of these things would impact the game immensely. Not necessarily in a good way. 1. GK trainer would DRASTICALLY reduce GK value. Makes him just another player, one of the great things about this game is that you have to balance your training among everything. Making a sole GK trainer would ruin that balance. 2. This would decrease the flow of $$ (or €) into the hands of the admins, never going to happen. 3. Would decrease EVERYONE's value, coaches would be half as good, and EVERYONE's forecasts would be 99. it would be no good to anyone. 4. Is this supposed to be a transfer window? What about the people who join when this window isn't open that drastically need a better GK? Even the coaches in the real world hate the idea of a transfer window, it's simply not a good idea. All in all I agree with 0% of these suggestions. |
02/11/2011 00:57 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
5569 msgs.
Golden Ball
|
Forget 2, that's a premium features that provides a good revenue stream for the devs. 3 is absolutely out of the question... You can already put 3 points on a player in a week. 2x training would be like 27 a month, meaning a lot of players could go from 30 to 80 in less than a season with ease. Transfers are anytime, the game would become dull without transfers at any time. Want to train gk? You have to sacrifice. That's why they are valuable... But they also go higher than any other position as a group... FC 90+ is not uncommon Nice one, akleb. |
02/11/2011 01:02 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
662 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
@rebsiot said: 3 is absolutely out of the question... You can already put 3 points on a player in a week. 2x training would be like 27 a month, meaning a lot of players could go from 30 to 80 in less than a season with ease. how can you put 3 pts on a player in a week? I have trained mids exclusively in my junior squad, with a 87% junior coach(which i am paying to much money for for my level, and upgraded with GB's), and 100+ motivation. most haven't gained a single point, one has gained 2. this is for the entire season. if this is actually possible, then there is more of a problem between the haves(higher divisions making way to much $) and the have nots, which will be near impossible to make up. In my private league, I noticed the revenue from a div 4 player was 2.8m for a game against me. In my home, the revenue is 500k. The money gap is already almost too large to make up, now the training is skewed as well? forgive me if i misunderstood. Just trying to figure it all out. |
02/11/2011 02:39 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
2108 msgs.
Best scorer
|
You're missing progression, an extra factor. It lets me put on 2.7 with a coach exactly like yours. As far as the money gap work on your stadium instead of your players, its the main source of money. At division 4 87% JC is about average. | 02/11/2011 02:46 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
662 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
hewhoamareismyself said: You're missing progression, an extra factor. It lets me put on 2.7 with a coach exactly like yours. As far as the money gap work on your stadium instead of your players, its the main source of money. At division 4 87% JC is about average. yikes. what are the odds that all 13(well..maybe 12) of my junior mids are all extremely low progression(close to 0)? Think about it. you can put 2.7 pts with same coach, I haven't put a point on a single player(sans one, with 2 pts) in the entire season. that is several weeks worth of training ONLY mids..not a single point added.(some are only 2 weeks worth, others are much longer) 13 juniors, all forecasted to 55+, several forecasted into the 70's, yet none are adding pts. Since I don't have a school, I can't see progression. What are some of the values? can some be near 0? what is the avg progression for juniors? at the avg, what should they be adding per week with 87% jc? |
02/11/2011 02:55 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
76 msgs.
Rookie
|
Ok point 2 in out due to revenue of the developers. But am right about other piont cos am talking of REALITY which everybody think is not neccessary. Happy gaming. |
02/11/2011 04:44 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
5569 msgs.
Golden Ball
|
All of the players rejected reality when training was lowered at beginning of season. Reality was a big fail.  |
02/11/2011 05:50 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
1
