| Forum » General » League 4 / 4 on fire! | Date | |
|---|---|---|
|
Username
113 msgs.
Substitute
|
First, I want you to know that not mastered English. I speak through the google translator. I apologize for the distress and anger that this has occurred in the partners of this great game. I can not control the actions of any @ (thankfully), nor what is said in the forum. But I can tell the truth because of this issue, if it helps someone. The relationship I have with other managers is the same with players who share a League. Nothing more, nothing less. The truth of the matter is that if you look closely, I have lost more games against my rivals in the rise (Matula, Ventus, National, Bolton, Cheltenham), which won. Therefore, any outcome in the game would have been logical. However, considering that my 2 best players are assigned (PO and IM), and you can not buy the next season, had a clear conscience that my project team was not mature enough to face the challenge of the category. So I told the fellow that he was more qualified than me to play in a higher division. There are no injured third party, right? I can understand the criticism, all right, but the only one hurt, I did not want to move up because I had no competitive team to meet this challenge. Therefore, anyone use me to me to |
12/09/2011 14:43 |
| ß Golden Truffo ß - Div3/Gr2 | ||
|
Username
715 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
I think the big thing here is that people want to be treated fairly. @ are not above the law, and when something smells fishy people look for fish (or other err... hiding things). | 12/09/2011 14:48 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
6256 msgs.
Golden Ball
|
I see a lot worse teams than yours going up mate. Look at the board above yours 4/5, you could certainly beat position 4 and 5. The injured 3rd party is the system and our trust in it. |
12/09/2011 14:53 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
5205 msgs.
Golden Ball
|
Bravo!! I am beyond appreciative of your mature and restrained attitude, this restores my faith in a game I was disgusted enough with to quit. Thank you! I will feel even better once the @ disappears from the abusers in question. Thanks, Greg @Rand said: I havent read all the topics about this issue. But i would like someone to give me a quick recap about this. I'll tell you what i know so far, and what i think about it, and let's see if we agree. As far as i know, what happened is that the manager Jeys68 didnt want to promote to the 3rd division. So he let his friends get the promotion for him. I have no problems to say that i find this act despicable. They've proved they have zero morale, and there is no defense on what they have done. I have to say 2 more things about it: 1.- The fact that they are @. I am terribly angry at them right now. I havent been able to talk to them, but i will most probably take out their @, as they have lost all my confidence. They've proven me that they can act as kids if the situation requires it, and that is something a good @ can never do. They represent us as a company, and we cannot allow this type of behaviour from them. 2.- The only point that acts as their defense, is the fact that noone got penalized for it. i mean, noone from the outside. Jeys68 didnt want the promotion, so he gave it to their colleagues ( they're all friends from spanish striker ). This is the only fact that can help them, but for me is not enough. As for the punishment, we have never punished these types of behaviour before, not even in striker spanish. It is not enough to apply article 9 of the game rules. It's only 2 games in the end. If someone else would have got affected by this, then we would talk about this again, but that is not the case, so i would vote for not punishing them. Let me hear your thoughts about this, please, i'm interested in what you think about it. But please stick to the topic, dont talk about closed topics and such, we can talk about this in some other topic. Edited by @Rand 12-09-2011 11:52 Edited by @Rand 12-09-2011 11:52 Edited by @Rand 12-09-2011 12:10 |
12/09/2011 14:56 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
113 msgs.
Substitute
|
grantis45 said: I see a lot worse teams than yours going up mate. Look at the board above yours 4/5, you could certainly beat position 4 and 5. The injured 3rd party is the system and our trust in it. Look, I won my Chestenham precisely equal Bolton, National as well, as Ventus and Matula. I have no better team than them, so I have passed in the clashes. They won the best, as always or almost, but do not want to admit. The greater or less faith in the system does not hold in this case, because, I repeat, no injured third parties. Thank you. |
12/09/2011 14:58 |
| ß Golden Truffo ß - Div3/Gr2 | ||
|
Username
3756 msgs.
Best scorer
|
And talking about deals lower than the market value; I have screen shot of the top teams in Div 4 and most of the transfers, auctions and Direct buy of players has always been less than the market value. I was sanctioned 20 M for a RIM 67/21 and there are teams who bought the same average player for less than 15 M. So my question to the @s out there is it justified. And most irregular transfers have been in the league in question involving the @. Edited by lucifercave 12-09-2011 15:04 |
12/09/2011 15:04 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
4820 msgs.
Best scorer
|
I once asked for fair value of a 68/21 LIM and the answered was 8-12 mil. That was just a couple of weeks ago |
12/09/2011 15:08 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
5205 msgs.
Golden Ball
|
I just bought a 72/22 RIM on auction for 14mill, so 8-12mill sounds about right. The 14mill may have been high even, because no one else bid. | 12/09/2011 15:10 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
921 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
Stay on topic please. | 12/09/2011 15:12 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
6256 msgs.
Golden Ball
|
Jeys68 said: grantis45 said: I see a lot worse teams than yours going up mate. Look at the board above yours 4/5, you could certainly beat position 4 and 5. The injured 3rd party is the system and our trust in it. Look, I won my Chestenham precisely equal Bolton, National as well, as Ventus and Matula. I have no better team than them, so I have passed in the clashes. They won the best, as always or almost, but do not want to admit. The greater or less faith in the system does not hold in this case, because, I repeat, no injured third parties. Thank you. Maybe no injuries, but two people gained unfairly what they wanted. You avoided going up, the @ gained promotion that he didn't fairly gain. You actually beat cheltenham 4-2 back in July. |
12/09/2011 15:13 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
8
