| Forum » General » League 4 / 4 on fire! | Date | |
|---|---|---|
|
3168 msgs.
Best scorer
|
Our actions are defensible, but if nobody wants to believe and everyone tries to shows us as cheaters... there's nothing I can do... Think whatever you want mate. |
10/09/2011 16:37 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
769 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
@Dnsvnsk said: Horath said: @Dnsvnsk said: Ok. Point 1: Jeys told me the other day he DOESN'T WANT to rise to div. 3. You can message him to confirm this. Point 2: @Daniel Adair trains GKs, that's why he temp promote his junior GK, to have him with 200% of motivation. Point 3: @Daniel Adair though the next match was a private league match, for that reason he put the weak players, as he does every weekend. These are the explanations, now it is your decision if believe it or not. But I can assure you they are completely true. Point 1: A friend A told me the other day he DOESN'T WANT a 17/55 90% prog. 85 FC CF. You can message him to confirm this. Point 2: A friend B who trains CF, that's why he bought that 17/55 CF for 5mill, to train him up to full potential. Point 3: A friend B thought that the trade was legit, as both players agreed to it, as it would make sense in real world. This is more or less the same case and both is breaching the rules, now it's your decision whether you will follow the rule quoted by Slipi or not. But i can assure you those rules were set by GMs, admins and game owners. Dvsnk theres no point in talk if gonna be banned cause ur breaking rules either ur banned or daniel aldair is banned or both are banned. So stop agruing and start begging. The difference is that your history is false and mine is true. |
10/09/2011 16:37 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
769 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
@Dnsvnsk said: Our actions are defensible, but if nobody wants to believe and everyone tries to shows us as cheaters... there's nothing I can do... Think whatever you want mate. Defensible? u @s are too arrogent |
10/09/2011 16:38 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
1798 msgs.
International
|
@Dnsvnsk said: Horath said: @Dnsvnsk said: Ok. Point 1: Jeys told me the other day he DOESN'T WANT to rise to div. 3. You can message him to confirm this. Point 2: @Daniel Adair trains GKs, that's why he temp promote his junior GK, to have him with 200% of motivation. Point 3: @Daniel Adair though the next match was a private league match, for that reason he put the weak players, as he does every weekend. These are the explanations, now it is your decision if believe it or not. But I can assure you they are completely true. Point 1: A friend A told me the other day he DOESN'T WANT a 17/55 90% prog. 85 FC CF. You can message him to confirm this. Point 2: A friend B who trains CF, that's why he bought that 17/55 CF for 5mill, to train him up to full potential. Point 3: A friend B thought that the trade was legit, as both players agreed to it, as it would make sense in real world. This is more or less the same case and both is breaching the rules, now it's your decision whether you will follow the rule quoted by Slipi or not. But i can assure you those rules were set by GMs, admins and game owners. The difference is that your history is false and mine is true. nah, the common point from both quoted posts is that both are made up. |
10/09/2011 16:38 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
3188 msgs.
Best scorer
|
Heeeeeeeeeey people, i remember you that you cant accuse a manager in the forum and : These topics cant be treated in the forum, so i close it. |
10/09/2011 16:39 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
113 msgs.
Substitute
|
Explanations. Now I'm going to explain you why @Dnsvnsk beat @Daniel Adair... Few days ago, I told @Dns I didn't want to rise to div. 3 cause I think I was not able and ready to face the challenge of being in that division. I lose the match against him voluntarily. He beats @Daniel Adair because I request them to do that. And they accepted. @Dns wanted to rise and I prefered to stay. So.. what is the problem? You may think I could have lose any of the other matches I haven't played yet... but the teams are so weak that I could win them accidentally. The version of @Dnsvnsk is completely true. I hope this will help you to understand what has happened. |
10/09/2011 20:58 |
| ß Golden Truffo ß - Div3/Gr2 | ||
|
Username
5569 msgs.
Golden Ball
|
Explanation by @dns should have stopped at point 1 then. Points three and two tainted the witness, because they were so patently not true or contributed to the sense of conspiracy. Make no mistake it was collusion to help another team, although the intentions were good, it is similar to "hey, I can't afford xyz can you overbuy this player? " Good intentions that get you sanctioned without questions. If I did someone a favor that involved fixing a transaction outside of the norm to benefit someone, i would be punished. This was a favor that involved fixing a transaction (game) outside of the norm to benefit someone. You do the math Edited by rebsiot 10-09-2011 22:26 |
10/09/2011 22:26 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
5569 msgs.
Golden Ball
|
This also strikes me as odd. All jeys had to do was field a team with all 11 players out of position. He would have lost his last 3 games and missed promotion with no action taken from another team. Why was it necessary to fix this particular match? Edited by rebsiot 10-09-2011 22:40 |
10/09/2011 22:40 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
921 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
Ah, thread re-opened. Why did @Dnsvnsk have to lie to everyone in his point 2 and point 3 explanation? To lose games, I'm that fielding everyone out of position makes it much easier to lose games (for Jeys), rather than only going halfway and playing a second team with useless GK that looks suspicious (@Daniel). Regardless of intention, there was collusion to "fix" who ended where in the league. Still should be punished. |
10/09/2011 22:48 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
5569 msgs.
Golden Ball
|
The thread was reopened only so jeys could post his explanation. something stinks, because another thread could have been opened FOUR HOURS ago and this explanation posted. Because that's when jeys was asked and responded to me with acknowledgement. Now, in a very coordinated fashion the thread is reopened and magically an explanation appears to perfectly corroborate the story given earlier. Threads are never reopened. In fact this is the first time I've seen this in my nearly five months here. Can we get a senior @ involved? |
10/09/2011 23:15 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
4
