depay210 said:

I would have love to asked this guy which browser he uses to simulate his games aside puffing but alas he's GONE... 😆😆😆😆😆


Edited by depay210 06-04-2022 23:10

@Colebourn said:


Damn.. how are we going to find multis now!?

Sir. Emelie said:


LOL... How wish you don't know answer to this question.


However, many things said here ain't completely lie. I could remember how @sicox treated my sister (User "Mr. Wenger ") in this game that she had to give up on the game. How he was so certain that she was multi accounting whereas I was the one that even created the account she was playing with. The only account she had. She got pissed and gradually, she stopped logging in.


The thing is, sometimes, it's the manner and content of your message to a user as a fiscal. Don't be putting it to them that they are cheating whereas some don't. It really hurts most users especially the innocent ones, yes, I know you don't know who is innocent or not but do a thorough investigation before detaining a user or sending them hurtful messages calling them cheaters, you may be wrong. Those days, if a fiscal detains you and he is not able to explain to you what you did, may be that fiscal may not be good with choice of words or he lacks experience on how to, he will shift your case to another fiscal. More experienced fiscal.

The very and first time I was fined, the fiscal gave me a thorough detail on why he will fine me with a good sense of humour. I think that was @Vgates. At the end of the day, I realised it was my mistake and I personally admitted. He showed some clemency, even, with the punishment.

But these days, it is very easy to remove or press the button even without giving people room to know what they did and defend or explain themselves. It really hurts.

All is well...

@sicox86 said:

I have to admit, I'm a little bit shocked to read these views.
I looked into the case again and the messages to and from Mr. Wenger and my view of events is very different. As you know, I won't go into the details of the case but I think we were both relatively pleasant if direct to each other and I'm surprised this conversation was in any way related to Mr. Wenger leaving the game. I did explain what the details of the detention were and from what I'm reading into the transcript the responses were not particularly convincing. At no point did I call the other user a cheat or anything else of that nature - this is a pure lie. Still, I judged it was probably a coincidence with the data, used my discretion and applied no sanction at all.

There is so much nonsense in this post it's difficult to know where to start - in a case where I presented the issue, used my discretion and applied no sanction why on earth would another 'more experienced' fiscal be brought into the case? How much free time should we give to non-events?

I'm shocked to read this and I'm disappointed once again that another user finds it necessary, without knowing the facts, to resort to criticism of a personal nature. This has crossed a personal boundary as it contains outright lies. If you were writing this about any other user I'd consider this against the forum rules. I've kept the thread open despite repeated forum rule breaches but please don't make me close it as that's not in anyone's interest.