Go to page 1, 2
  Forum » Suggestions » Waive the 8000 experience rule Date
672 msgs.
MVP of the game
 If a user under 8000 experience goes inactive for more than two weeks, the hostile protection should be waived. I'm tired of seeing good juniors go to waste. 31/10/2013 23:59
  - Div/Gr
Username
5633 msgs.
Golden Ball
 It used to be that teams that were active for more than two weeks (I think, may have been a month) became hostilable. The 8000 exp rule was implemented to stop cheating, and to allow new users enough time to become familiar enough with the game to be aware of hostiling.

Having said that, I agree, it seems a long time 		01/11/2013 00:27
  - Div/Gr
672 msgs.
MVP of the game
@practicesquad said:
It used to be that teams that were active for more than two weeks (I think, may have been a month) became hostilable. The 8000 exp rule was implemented to stop cheating, and to allow new users enough time to become familiar enough with the game to be aware of hostiling.

Having said that, I agree, it seems a long time


I like the rule, but it should only apply to teams that are active. If a manager is inactive, there's no reason to keep his players safe. 		01/11/2013 02:34
  - Div/Gr
Username
21587 msgs.
Golden Ball
 But they are his players,anyway anyhow 01/11/2013 03:21
  🦊3773™ - Div2/Gr1
Username
5633 msgs.
Golden Ball
 I think even if they aren't inactive the hostile protection clause should be time based rather than experience based. From memory a team goes bot if the account is unused in 45 days, so perhaps make protection last 40 days. It used to be that way, but for various reasons it was stopped. I know what you mean Oye and the point is not that the players don't belong to that team, rather that good players go to waste quite often. I don't know what the solution is tbh. 01/11/2013 05:42
  - Div/Gr
Username
5633 msgs.
Golden Ball
 I just thought of something, maybe when a team goes bot it is automatically reset and the previous squads put on auction. That way no one gets an advantage and the inactive manager is unaffected. Thoughts? 01/11/2013 05:47
  - Div/Gr
672 msgs.
MVP of the game
@practicesquad said:
I just thought of something, maybe when a team goes bot it is automatically reset and the previous squads put on auction. That way no one gets an advantage and the inactive manager is unaffected. Thoughts?


+1 		01/11/2013 06:00
  - Div/Gr
Username
3756 msgs.
Best scorer
@practicesquad said:
I just thought of something, maybe when a team goes bot it is automatically reset and the previous squads put on auction. That way no one gets an advantage and the inactive manager is unaffected. Thoughts?


But what if he has a 80+ average team in div 4. While half of the league managers play against a 80 average team and after an instant reset the bots average is reduced to 40-50, wouldnt the managers playing him later get an unfair advantage of facing a lower averaged bot? 		01/11/2013 06:37
  - Div/Gr
Username
3439 msgs.
Best scorer
 How pained I was to see a 14 year old 98 progression LIM become part of a bot team.

They are the essence of this game, and they should be made readily available. 		01/11/2013 06:49
  PSG - Div3/Gr10
Username
3756 msgs.
Best scorer
 If every 80+ prog player was to be made available for hostile then the market has no meaning. The rarity of such high progression players is what drives the market, you take that away and you will end up with dead drop prices for high average players and ultimately even a div 5 team will have a 80+ average team like the spanish server.

Though ultimately we will reach the same point as the spanish server 		01/11/2013 07:10
  - Div/Gr
     
Go to page 1, 2
1