@lucifercave said:


But what if he has a 80+ average team in div 4. While half of the league managers play against a 80 average team and after an instant reset the bots average is reduced to 40-50, wouldnt the managers playing him later get an unfair advantage of facing a lower averaged bot?

@practicesquad said:


I don't think this is relevant because they could just as easily be reset for having less than 11 players - which they will be eventually anyway. So where before teams would have faced an inactive manager with an 80+ team, they will now face a system bot with 40-50 ave team. There is no disadvantage here for me.

Oyewale said:
Am whats the conclusion about this,because in few days this thread will be no where to be found..i mean down the drain just like others..

@practicesquad said:
I think even if they aren't inactive the hostile protection clause should be time based rather than experience based. From memory a team goes bot if the account is unused in 45 days, so perhaps make protection last 40 days. It used to be that way, but for various reasons it was stopped. I know what you mean Oye and the point is not that the players don't belong to that team, rather that good players go to waste quite often. I don't know what the solution is tbh.

@lucifercave said:
If every 80+ prog player was to be made available for hostile then the market has no meaning. The rarity of such high progression players is what drives the market, you take that away and you will end up with dead drop prices for high average players and ultimately even a div 5 team will have a 80+ average team like the spanish server.

Though ultimately we will reach the same point as the spanish server