| Forum » Suggestions » resign junior | Date | |
|---|---|---|
|
good or bad idea ?
|
||
|
Fiscal
3449 msgs.
Best scorer
|
I did sort of assume things with my idea earlier, so let me flesh it out. 1. My idea was assuming you only actually got 1 hostile at "hostile time" as it is now. So at best the worst division 7 team still could only get 1 good player. 2. Part of the risk of throwing a waiver claim on a player is that the player could get resigned, and I'm sure plently of noobs would learn the hard way when they put all their claims on an active manager's players. This would at least reward a division 6 or 7 player who figured out the game quickly and put their time in searching. You still have to search, find the proper players, and have enough money to hostile the players. Imagine if you were a 7th division team and you picked up a 60 average player. It's not going to totally change your team where you're suddenly a first division team, but it's going to make you more excited to keep playing and it's going to give you a little boost to your team. I don't know why so many people in the game seem to want anything but parity in this game. To many "fair" seems to be things they and a few others benefit from. Parity is what keeps online multiplayer games alive, and at the moment there is very little parity to the game. |
09/07/2012 02:11 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
1368 msgs.
International
|
illex said: I did sort of assume things with my idea earlier, so let me flesh it out. 1. My idea was assuming you only actually got 1 hostile at "hostile time" as it is now. So at best the worst division 7 team still could only get 1 good player. 2. Part of the risk of throwing a waiver claim on a player is that the player could get resigned, and I'm sure plently of noobs would learn the hard way when they put all their claims on an active manager's players. This would at least reward a division 6 or 7 player who figured out the game quickly and put their time in searching. You still have to search, find the proper players, and have enough money to hostile the players. Imagine if you were a 7th division team and you picked up a 60 average player. It's not going to totally change your team where you're suddenly a first division team, but it's going to make you more excited to keep playing and it's going to give you a little boost to your team. I don't know why so many people in the game seem to want anything but parity in this game. To many "fair" seems to be things they and a few others benefit from. Parity is what keeps online multiplayer games alive, and at the moment there is very little parity to the game. I like this system. It solves Ubuntu's and soli's concerns. The one hostile per team would still be in place, and it would give lower tier managers a chance to catch up to the big guns, like soli and ubuntu. Changes need to be made in order to encourage the many people who are signing up now to remain in the game. |
09/07/2012 02:59 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
2737 msgs.
Best scorer
|
I dont have any concerns, you think the current system is not fair and have a suggestion to make it better. I think the current system is fair because everyone in the game can start hostiling at the same time...if anything, its never the rich teams that get the cheap hostiles. Other might agree with you, or me...not a big deal  |
09/07/2012 03:23 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
772 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
@solirocket said: I think the current system is fair because everyone in the game can start hostiling at the same time... Only if you're lucky with your time zone. Not sure there is an easy way to resolve this issue though. |
09/07/2012 10:46 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
4993 msgs.
Best scorer
|
FC Ubuntu said: The current system gives everyone "equal chance". this. |
09/07/2012 11:20 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
908 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
FC Ubuntu said: The current system gives everyone "equal chance". He is absolutely right. If u wanna hostile some player then Wake up @ whatever time the Hostile time starts and start getting all ur players. Some people might have inconvience because of thier ''Time Zone'' But all those who are really interested will even Log on IN night and start Hostiling. please Ignore all spelling mistakes. Edited by rajeev20198 09-07-2012 11:27 |
09/07/2012 11:26 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
3756 msgs.
Best scorer
|
illex said: I did sort of assume things with my idea earlier, so let me flesh it out. 1. My idea was assuming you only actually got 1 hostile at "hostile time" as it is now. So at best the worst division 7 team still could only get 1 good player. 2. Part of the risk of throwing a waiver claim on a player is that the player could get resigned, and I'm sure plently of noobs would learn the hard way when they put all their claims on an active manager's players. This would at least reward a division 6 or 7 player who figured out the game quickly and put their time in searching. You still have to search, find the proper players, and have enough money to hostile the players. Imagine if you were a 7th division team and you picked up a 60 average player. It's not going to totally change your team where you're suddenly a first division team, but it's going to make you more excited to keep playing and it's going to give you a little boost to your team. I don't know why so many people in the game seem to want anything but parity in this game. To many "fair" seems to be things they and a few others benefit from. Parity is what keeps online multiplayer games alive, and at the moment there is very little parity to the game. Ok lets assume a Div 5 team gets a player from an inactive manager from Div 1-2. How is he ever gonna pay his salary of 1m+?? He will go in red in just 2 weeks time and the player will be again on the market or better still it might get hostiled again. So whats the point there? |
09/07/2012 15:58 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Fiscal
3449 msgs.
Best scorer
|
lucifercave said: Ok lets assume a Div 5 team gets a player from an inactive manager from Div 1-2. How is he ever gonna pay his salary of 1m+?? He will go in red in just 2 weeks time and the player will be again on the market or better still it might get hostiled again. So whats the point there? Fair enough point, and obviously there would be players who grab 70+ average players who put their clauses at 50 million, thinking how awesome getting 50 million dollars would be which for them it would be, and then immediately got hostiled. That 50 million is still going to buy them 2 pretty good players. Players they had a snowballs chance in hell of getting before. My idea still implies that a manger has to be smart and even if there was a 98 average player available to hostile, they'd have to know that they're better off immediately selling that player. Realistically, they'd hold onto the player for a week or two, find that the salary is way too much for them to afford, and sell the player. Even if they have to short sell the player for less than the max value, that money is still more money than they could have ever made in the next 3 seasons. These are all extreme examples, and realistically it would probably just push a few decent 50 av/high forecast players to lower divisions than they would have gone with normal hostiles. Best or worse case scenario it helps to distribute a little wealth down through the ranks, which only very rarely happens right now. |
09/07/2012 16:56 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
1382 msgs.
International
|
akleb said: all junior should be resigned in the beginning of the season , and we should have the ability to remove the R for free for a the first week of the new season . 1) in this way no one gets free players from managers that are quitting . 2) all players from teams that are system bot , even juniors that have R sign , should be put in auction for 0 .( that way everyone has equal chance of getting them and luck would affect it) Edited by akleb 08-07-2012 10:22 Going back to the original post, id Have to agree that the current system is fair and just. its not too much effort to re-sign all your juniors. The market has plenty of juniors that are relatively low cost. I have gotten 3 players in the last week and paid zero on two and $50,000 bid on another and each had a decent forcast. people arent taking advantage enough i think. More junior bot players right now, could create more problems by over saturating the current marketplace. Just my two cents i could be right or wrong. Edited by cmccourt 09-07-2012 18:32 |
09/07/2012 18:32 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
4257 msgs.
Best scorer
|
i am not talking about high FC junior player going for low prices , i am talking about 70 + players going for few mill , how does it feel , if u trained a player to reach 75 + for 3 season , and someone just came to the game , hostiled one for 2 mill ... the idea is , all teams that turns system bot , will put their players in auction for 0 ( so everyone has equal chances to bid for them) ... that would really help inflation because i pay 200 mill for an high average junior , the money will go out of the game and to a system bot ,not to another manager . |
09/07/2012 18:43 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
4
