| Forum » Suggestions » FORCAST FOR FREE | Date | |
|---|---|---|
|
FORCAST SHOULD NOT COST GOLDEN BALLS
|
||
|
Username
104 msgs.
Substitute
|
its a late game thing. but i think it totally pays off. You need the talent anyway right? | 28/02/2012 19:07 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
110 msgs.
Substitute
|
He means the market is being drowned because people sell players that are not valuable for their team. I have a China school that I sell 50% of the players. I just sold a CF for 1,750,000. That payed for the original cost of the school. I just recently upgraded to normal and will hopefully be able to sell more players and continue to cover the cost for all my schools by using just the China school selling those players. | 28/02/2012 19:21 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
212 msgs.
Substitute
|
Dr Krkobabic said: Are you saying that building a excellent rated school in China or Brasil doesn't pay off? Did I get it wright, is that what you claim? Edited by Dr Krkobabic 28-02-2012 16:44 Totally, I think it is possible to prove it emperically. See my thread on this previously. http://uk.strikermanager.com/foros/hilo.php?id=270251 |
28/02/2012 19:34 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
104 msgs.
Substitute
|
cheers! a very insightful post. Should be stickied...perhaps you know where I could find the chart for training? I am looking percentage figures... cheers! |
28/02/2012 20:02 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
268 msgs.
First-team player
|
No buddy, you didn't prove that exc. rated school in China or Brasil doesn't pay off, you just proved that there are better schools to invest in! My point is that manager in this game can't make a mistake if he invest in building schools, its ALWAYS (sorry for the caps) pays off - in China, Brazil, etc. little less, in Netherlands, Germany, etc. little more. Also, the investment in school pays off to fast, after month or two, its unrealistic. |
28/02/2012 21:37 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
2608 msgs.
Best scorer
|
Schools RARELY give 80+prog. And you don't see many people paying 10M for the players, so I don't see what this has to do here with GB and market inflation. Schools pays off but usually don't get more than 1M per player, and most schools take 2weeks to give a player. |
28/02/2012 21:48 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
212 msgs.
Substitute
|
patient said: Schools RARELY give 80+prog. And you don't see many people paying 10M for the players, so I don't see what this has to do here with GB and market inflation. Schools pays off but usually don't get more than 1M per player, and most schools take 2weeks to give a player. Sorry totally off topic. Ultimate, paying gb for forecast is a good idea. Try to get the free ones (netfliks) etc. |
29/02/2012 00:24 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
212 msgs.
Substitute
|
Dr Krkobabic said: No buddy, you didn't prove that exc. rated school in China or Brasil doesn't pay off, you just proved that there are better schools to invest in! My point is that manager in this game can't make a mistake if he invest in building schools, its ALWAYS (sorry for the caps) pays off - in China, Brazil, etc. little less, in Netherlands, Germany, etc. little more. Also, the investment in school pays off to fast, after month or two, its unrealistic. Agreed, some schools are poor investments in relative terms, not in absolute terms. |
29/02/2012 00:29 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
3547 msgs.
Best scorer
|
actually you don't have to use GB to figure out the player's forecast If you're experienced enough you can tell how good he is Plus 10 GB is not really a big deal , haha |
29/02/2012 01:18 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
268 msgs.
First-team player
|
You can not use free GB for forecast. I had free GB and I could use them only for optimizing ticket prices, changing kits... Edited by Dr Krkobabic 29-02-2012 13:16 |
29/02/2012 13:15 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
5
