s_rajeev18 said:
guys u can make them play there use advanced formation if u havent started exploring!!!!!!
if a Inner mid plays as a DFm then he needs strength and other attributes but u can play him there just look at my rb he can play as cdf he is 49 and can play cdf at 44 not a big loss as my cdf is a 46 so they are good just the way they are and please stop adding that 5 gbs thingie cause many of us dont have credit cards.
and i really would appreciate this if u work hard and win the game just as it is.
look if a im can play a dfm then dfm's value will be = to value of im
if gk can play cf then he wont be able to shot and at many times would catch the ball in his hand(he would take time to understand )
if a def can play any where in defence then the price of rb lb cdf rdf ldf would became same
if a middle player can play any where in middle the whats the use if specification.
look if u like the game then play it as it is dont change it cause a slight change also affects people,

Beanwalker20 said:
Let look at it this way, if messi who is LM years back is now CF and ronaldo who is formerly RM is now LW and both adapt quikly that means they both hav 99% versility.
But imagine messi playing as LB or ronaldo becos they have 99% versatility no matter what, they hav to drop some point in there chart. So versatility is good enough the way it is now.
But if you say player should be able to play another position with the help of level of experience that aslo good but with time some players will loose their value.