Go to page 1
| Forum » General » CLARIFICATION RULE 14 | Date | |
|---|---|---|
|
Username
3967 msgs.
Best scorer
|
http://en.strikermanager.com/foros/hilo.php?id=524860 I'm not trying to report anyone PLS its a general forum, anybody can be discussed in as much as its not leading to throwing offensive words. Thanks . (Disclaimer) I wanted to hostile a player last week after this event has occured ,,,,,,for my Tuesday and Thursday non beta game .. Then I discovered the player m going to hostile has a lot of goals which will overtake the recent one hostiled by bluebird. Wanted to know if I would get punished for trying to counter bluebird's hostile since my player was going to take over highest goal scored... Decided to not worry about anything again . It can happen to anyone, just thought an @ will be able to help with the clarification . |
03/09/2020 13:17 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Fiscal
4046 msgs.
Best scorer
|
I can't speak to individual cases in the forum but my view on these incidents is to assess the goals as part of the decision-making process in purchasing or valuing the player. If the player seems to fit into the strategy of the team and the transfer generally makes sense, I would be inclined to lean towards it being fair. If it's clearly an attempt to swing the top scorer award, or generally manipulate some bug/quirk in the game with no other significant benefit to the buying team, I'd more likely suspect foul play. In cases of doubt, the @s discuss. |
03/09/2020 16:43 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
3967 msgs.
Best scorer
|
@sicox86 said: I can't speak to individual cases in the forum but my view on these incidents is to assess the goals as part of the decision-making process in purchasing or valuing the player. If the player seems to fit into the strategy of the team and the transfer generally makes sense, I would be inclined to lean towards it being fair. If it's clearly an attempt to swing the top scorer award, or generally manipulate some bug/quirk in the game with no other significant benefit to the buying team, I'd more likely suspect foul play. In cases of doubt, the @s discuss. Okay thank you . |
03/09/2020 19:02 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
240 msgs.
Substitute
|
@sicox86 said: I can't speak to individual cases in the forum but my view on these incidents is to assess the goals as part of the decision-making process in purchasing or valuing the player. If the player seems to fit into the strategy of the team and the transfer generally makes sense, I would be inclined to lean towards it being fair. If it's clearly an attempt to swing the top scorer award, or generally manipulate some bug/quirk in the game with no other significant benefit to the buying team, I'd more likely suspect foul play. In cases of doubt, the @s discuss. I don't get few things here - 1. if player is valuable, because of goals or any other value, why owner didn't resign him? If he missed to do that, why to punish anyone who found that mistake? 2. Best scorer award is, how much? 100 GB? And someone would really spend a fortune - thus bringing his team to financial knees - to get those GB which actually cannot do almost nothing compared to money spent? C'mon, 600 GB is 5 euro. Maybe I am missing something and I am very sorry, but really can't see where is the catch. |
03/09/2020 19:59 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
3967 msgs.
Best scorer
|
Darewolf said: @sicox86 said: I can't speak to individual cases in the forum but my view on these incidents is to assess the goals as part of the decision-making process in purchasing or valuing the player. If the player seems to fit into the strategy of the team and the transfer generally makes sense, I would be inclined to lean towards it being fair. If it's clearly an attempt to swing the top scorer award, or generally manipulate some bug/quirk in the game with no other significant benefit to the buying team, I'd more likely suspect foul play. In cases of doubt, the @s discuss. I don't get few things here - 1. if player is valuable, because of goals or any other value, why owner didn't resign him? If he missed to do that, why to punish anyone who found that mistake? 2. Best scorer award is, how much? 100 GB? And someone would really spend a fortune - thus bringing his team to financial knees - to get those GB which actually cannot do almost nothing compared to money spent? C'mon, 600 GB is 5 euro. Maybe I am missing something and I am very sorry, but really can't see where is the catch. A lot of top teams have the habbit of hostiling players from lower division because of gbs . mostly div3-div1 You should know that the RC of div5-div6 top scorers anybody can afford . That's why there's a fine . |
03/09/2020 20:14 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
240 msgs.
Substitute
|
Darra said: A lot of top teams have the habbit of hostiling players from lower division because of gbs . mostly div3-div1 You should know that the RC of div5-div6 top scorers anybody can afford . That's why there's a fine . Thanks, but still, I can't see the point to spend few hundreds million to get 100 GB. Again, 600 GB = 5 €. Maybe I'll think different in higher leagues, dunno, but now, I'll be thrilled to sell some forward for 50 or more millions (most of div5 are players av <60) despite is he the best goalscorer or not. Thanks anyway. |
03/09/2020 21:39 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
Go to page 1
1
