Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
  Forum » Suggestions » FINANCE CORRUPTION Date
Username
3967 msgs.
Best scorer
Financial adviser are also in charge of cash loans


A 99% will get you a better loan from bank than a 60% ....


Stop complicating matters Mr man .....


Save your self from all this unnessary jagons ...
14/01/2019 01:07
  - Div/Gr
Username
3967 msgs.
Best scorer
galaxians said:
Bar Alade said:
How am I confusing myself? Understand my words. There should be a differentiation between fin adv of higher grade and of lower grade. Rather than just the billboards, television and sponsor that they do.

I understand you, but your point is not valid, they are not financial manager, they are only advisors they have no impact on your funds, they can only provide you with best offers for your billboards, sponsors etc... base on their % quality



Like he said
A 99% provides the best offer of billboards , sponsors etc ..another good point
14/01/2019 01:08
  - Div/Gr
Username
3967 msgs.
Best scorer
Lastly if you are suggesting there should be financial corruption


A big No.....

My last msg here


Edited by Darra 14-01-2019 01:13
14/01/2019 01:13
  - Div/Gr
Username
977 msgs.
MVP of the game
Darra said:
Lastly if you are suggesting there should be financial corruption


A big No.....

My last msg here


Edited by Darra 14-01-2019 01:13

You don't have the final say. There are guys out here who're also thinking of that. Your own opinion is that you're not interested...
14/01/2019 08:19
  - Div/Gr
Username
257 msgs.
First-team player
Why should there be corruption?? The game is complicated enough as it is, so don't suggest another problem... 14/01/2019 08:23
  - Div/Gr
Username
977 msgs.
MVP of the game
If you say so. "BEST OF LUCK" 14/01/2019 08:27
  - Div/Gr
Username
3869 msgs.
Best scorer
Bar Alade said:
You don't have the final say. There are guys out here who're also thinking of that. Your own opinion is that you're not interested...


and i think the other guys are your other multis abi?

Well what do you guys want sm to add to the financial advisor features precisely.
15/01/2019 11:51
  - Div/Gr
Fiscal
4046 msgs.
Best scorer
I'll try to answer the OP in a different way.
A financial advisor is not the same as an accountant.
Simply put, a better accountant would be better at recording your current income and suggesting ways to avoid tax.
A better financial advisor will better help you grow your investment.

It absolutely makes sense to question what value you get for your extra % financial advisor. A better financial advisor will give you better investment opportunities e.g. loan facilities, billboard or TV revenue etc. as has already been covered.

I believe what you're suggesting is a situation where some user's accounts were more accurate than others or where some pay more taxes than others. This would be an absolute nightmare for fiscals, as has also been mentioned. This will never change.

Edited by @sicox86 15-01-2019 17:15
15/01/2019 17:13
  - Div/Gr
Username
977 msgs.
MVP of the game
@sicox86 said:
I'll try to answer the OP in a different way.
A financial advisor is not the same as an accountant.
Simply put, a better accountant would be better at recording your current income and suggesting ways to avoid tax.
A better financial advisor will better help you grow your investment.

It absolutely makes sense to question what value you get for your extra % financial advisor. A better financial advisor will give you better investment opportunities e.g. loan facilities, billboard or TV revenue etc. as has already been covered.

I believe what you're suggesting is a situation where some user's accounts were more accurate than others or where some pay more taxes than others. This would be an absolute nightmare for fiscals, as has also been mentioned. This will never change.

Edited by @sicox86 15-01-2019 17:15

it seems you're coming to realise my objection. If fin. adv. is not responsible for accounts, then who?
15/01/2019 22:19
  - Div/Gr
Fiscal
4046 msgs.
Best scorer
Bar Alade said:
@sicox86 said:
I'll try to answer the OP in a different way.
A financial advisor is not the same as an accountant.
Simply put, a better accountant would be better at recording your current income and suggesting ways to avoid tax.
A better financial advisor will better help you grow your investment.

It absolutely makes sense to question what value you get for your extra % financial advisor. A better financial advisor will give you better investment opportunities e.g. loan facilities, billboard or TV revenue etc. as has already been covered.

I believe what you're suggesting is a situation where some user's accounts were more accurate than others or where some pay more taxes than others. This would be an absolute nightmare for fiscals, as has also been mentioned. This will never change.

Edited by @sicox86 15-01-2019 17:15

it seems you're coming to realise my objection. If fin. adv. is not responsible for accounts, then who?

The silent, irreplaceable accountant.
15/01/2019 23:01
  - Div/Gr
     
Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
3