| Forum » Suggestions » Too many 90+avg players in the game? | Date | |
|---|---|---|
|
Fiscal
4207 msgs.
Best scorer
|
ForzaJuve! said: mr_euskaltel said: part of the issue is that every time someone build a decent school you get more good players, maybe the number of good players provided by each country should be limited across the entire game? I have an excellent brazil school too, so doing that would harm me the same as everyone else, but it would add to realism. Edited by mr_euskaltel 29-10-2015 01:57 I am still waiting for a bomb player from my 6 schools. But its true. 80(ish) progress and 90-91 forecast are rather abundant. I have an excellent Netherlands school and consistently see other managers with high prog Netherlands players. I have never had over an 80 prog player from school. I'm not sure if my turn hasn't come around or if I need a different school - I doubt I will build any - but for what it is worth, there are many managers who have never seen a 90+ prog player in one of their schools. |
05/11/2015 21:59 |
| FC need more holidays - Div4/Gr7 | ||
|
Fiscal
4207 msgs.
Best scorer
|
ForzaJuve! said: For me there seems to be one crucial problem regarding the transfers and price checks (fair trade) F.e. menager brakes the rules and sells/buys a player or even more players under the fiar trade price (in order to get ahead or simple need of money quickly or whatever other reason there might be) He gets bombed, he gets fine. Not a problem there right? He is punished. In my opinion there is a problem there. A snowball effect because everyone rely on "similar transfers" tab to get an idea of the price for certain player. Such menagers little by little are droping the price of players in my opinion. You might say well thats just for transfer agreements, simply put it in auction. Well yeah, but when someone bids in auction he will probably also check for how much similar players went for before and if he sees he might get player of same strenght cheaper, he will not bid. When fiscals look at price checks upon a request and when we look at similars in determining punishment we take into consideration timing of sales, all team sell off's, and outlier prices. When I take a bombed case, I look at similars and if I see another out of market transaction, I will look into that on my own. it doesn't escape us. Anyone looking at similars who has been in this game for a few seasons should be able to spot an out of market transaction in the similars and know not to rely on it. If you have a doubt, ask an @. |
05/11/2015 22:02 |
| FC need more holidays - Div4/Gr7 | ||
|
Fiscal
4207 msgs.
Best scorer
|
porschewayne said: It all started when all the players left with no team was put up on auction all at the same time..players where going cheaply for as low as $0. many div 6 teams created an average 50 squad under just two days. I think its one of the reasons why players are going away cheaply not just because managers are lazy, but because they already have the squad. I think this deflation will last two seasons before the market recovers from its current situation. as for the increase in the number of 90 average players, i think it should be somehow reduced... having to many messis and ronaldos could make a div 4 or 5 team look equal to a div1 team..i hope it doesn't happen. The deflation is a natural part of this game as other @'s in this thread have explained. The dev's recognized what happened in the Spanish server and made changes here in order to prevent that. One of those changes was limiting the sales of non team players to 75 avg or less - yes, there are some that slip by but many are not auctioned and are removed from the game. |
05/11/2015 22:04 |
| FC need more holidays - Div4/Gr7 | ||
|
Fiscal
4207 msgs.
Best scorer
|
elfolksy said: This trend will continue in as far as the approach to farming of players still exists. But then, if drastical changes is made to it, the well trained players will only be bought by the managers with the cash. Though the Market structure of this game is unique and attractive (from my perspective), the current trend will make the game to become technical and tactical prowess based. This is an excellent point and reinforces comments made before. We all have our own unique perspective and would like the market changed to reflect our particular circumstances - but any one change will affect someone else. The devs have tried to slow the natural deflation process while also attempting to limit the number of super players only affordable by the wealthy managers (no more star players) and trying to take money out of the game (no R for managers with more than 4 seasons). One side effect of reducing the money in the game for those wealthy managers is that hostiles and money being made off of hostiles has been drastically reduced. This has personally affected me but is probably a good thing in the long run. I know Div 1 managers that have very high weekly expenses - the attempt to reduce cash in the game is working on that end of the wealth continuum. In anticipating the evening out of the game in terms of cash, the devs also tried to control for the technical and tactical side of the game. They removed the ability to easily share formations. This was also based on the Spanish server where the majority of Div 1 teams used the exact same formation. For me, one great fix to the sim would be to revise the way xB, xM, and xW work. These three positions are underutilized if not almost completely irrelevant. Doing something to make them perform better - or superior under certain circumstances - would significantly enhance both the market and the tech/tactical aspects of the game. |
05/11/2015 22:12 |
| FC need more holidays - Div4/Gr7 | ||
|
Username
932 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
I am still waiting for a bomb player from my 6 schools. But its true. 80(ish) progress and 90-91 forecast are rather abundant. I have an excellent Netherlands school and consistently see other managers with high prog Netherlands players. I have never had over an 80 prog player from school. I'm not sure if my turn hasn't come around or if I need a different school - I doubt I will build any - but for what it is worth, there are many managers who have never seen a 90+ prog player in one of their schools. I completely agree, which is why I posted this question. Edited by DirkDiggler 05-11-2015 22:20 Edited by DirkDiggler 05-11-2015 22:20 |
05/11/2015 22:13 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
3967 msgs.
Best scorer
|
High prog player such as 90+ should be coming out from excellent schools once in two season........am sure this will help Edited by Darra 05-11-2015 22:29 |
05/11/2015 22:28 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
932 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
Darra said: High prog player such as 90+ should be coming out from excellent schools once in two season........am sure this will help Edited by Darra 05-11-2015 22:29 Thats waaaaayyyyy too much. Think about how many managers have excellent schools open. This game would then be flooded 90+ prog players and prices will continue to dip. Serious deflation and possibly the elimination of 60 & 70 avg players |
05/11/2015 22:39 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
3967 msgs.
Best scorer
|
Consider div5 and 6 what will they be having in their squad | 05/11/2015 22:45 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
4
