Forum » Doubts and questions » DELETION OF JUNIOR'S RESIGNATION | Date | |
---|---|---|
Username
5280 msgs.
Golden Ball
|
Not been able to resign juniors will only favour higher div managers and d lower managers will find it hard to improve next season,I don't know why some of the improvement made this days only favour higher div managers. From next season,we will start paying higher salaries 4 player who isn't playing because we don't want him to be hustled,its just unfair,higher managers will enjoy it cus they have enough and will be able to hustle as much as they want to. We will be greatfu if they can please help us change this | 03/05/2015 11:34 |
- Div/Gr | ||
Username
21587 msgs.
Golden Ball
|
Nice suggestion! ![]() |
03/05/2015 11:55 |
🦊3773™ - Div3/Gr6 | ||
Username
623 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
am in suport | 03/05/2015 14:22 |
- Div/Gr | ||
Username
2906 msgs.
Best scorer
|
+1 I'm also in support... | 03/05/2015 15:29 |
Rest On OyeðŸ™ðŸ¿ðŸ’ - Div3/Gr12 | ||
Username
5280 msgs.
Golden Ball
|
Let's hope they change it | 03/05/2015 18:53 |
- Div/Gr | ||
Username
373 msgs.
First-team player
|
Look at this side of the story. Suppose a div 1 manager has a 97pg player. Most of them train 90-95pg+ players. Now we all know that a 97pg player is almost as good as a star used to be..so even a release clause as high as 2b wont be sufficient at times. So if that manager wants to keep the player ,he will give him a REALLLYY high salary on a weekly basis..we are taking abt 2-3m here. A div 2 nd higher manager on avg has atleast got 1 player more than 95pg in his squad. So a total of 100teams atleast paying 2m for one player atleast in a week..that is 200m/week out of the game. This when i considered that all the div 2+ teams have just one 95+pg player. We must remember that some have none while some have 6-7 95+pg players. This update,i feel will maKe those top div managers a bit more active than they have been in the recent past,which i think is definitely great for this game as a whole ![]() |
03/05/2015 19:34 |
- Div/Gr | ||
Username
2968 msgs.
Best scorer
|
It's same for all you just pay ~5% of your player worth in 4 seasons. If you train player that will worth 200m you pay 10m for 4 seasons if you train 2B player you pay 100m. I think this is fair update and will take money out of the game. Why you think now is fair? I train 1B players and i pay for them same salary as someone with low prog players. I will need to pay like 10m per week next season and you can do that for less than 1m. It's hurting big teams more than you think. |
04/05/2015 11:11 |
Wu wei - Div1/Gr1 | ||
Username
2186 msgs.
Best scorer
|
I think this is a fair update. Contrary to your opinion, lower team will have the chance to also own good average juniors. The key to this game on how to improve your squad is never hold on to any player, as personal quote goes 'every player is for sale, for the right price. All you need do is to place the hostile clause amount just above current market price of such junior, even if you get hostiled, you get cash to purchase a better player. The salary will be worth it. My weekly expenses is currently @ 47mil. I make just above 14mil on each of my games. Looking at my snr squad now, by next season I will have to renew all of my players' salary, and it will be double of their current salary if I really want to keep them. Imagine how it will be for higher div managers. In the long run, lower team manager will be able purchase players cheaply. Maybe I am wrong, this just analysis of my team. Edited by elfolksy 04-05-2015 18:13 |
04/05/2015 18:11 |
- Div/Gr | ||
Username
5280 msgs.
Golden Ball
|
Maybe you are right,but imagin someone training high prog juniors,their weekly salary will be even enough for managers to go bankrupt | 05/05/2015 00:44 |
- Div/Gr | ||
Username
1190 msgs.
International
|
so just sell them for big money and buy some more players...I don't see a big problem in this update. I think it will move much much money and it will also make the market more interesting | 05/05/2015 00:52 |
- Div/Gr | ||