Forum » Suggestions » Double hostile clause in "hall of fame" players | Date | |
---|---|---|
Username
1297 msgs.
International
|
Hi all, I wanted to suggest an improvement to hostile clauses in the game. Now, whenever you want, you can buy any player by paying its hostile clause. That sounds fair and realistic, however, I think if a player has spent all his career in a single team, and has the points needed for the hall of fame, it should be harder to buy that player because of that. If the player is attached to the team, it shouldn't be so easy to buy them. At least to double the hostile clause for the same amount, or apply any negotiation within teams for hostile clauses, to make it more realistic. I.E. I cannot imagine a Zanetti, a Bochini or a Riquelme (to choose some examples I'm familiar with) saying "I love this team I played so many years in, but screw you, I'm leaving for a team that payed all my hostile clause even if you don't want to, without listening any other offers you would make." IMO, it would make the game more realistic. Thanks! |
30/06/2014 16:11 |
AAYAG - Div2/Gr1 | ||
Username
117 msgs.
Substitute
|
thanks bro | 01/07/2014 11:48 |
- Div/Gr | ||
Username
476 msgs.
First-team player
|
Changeman FC said: Hi all, I wanted to suggest an improvement to hostile clauses in the game. Now, whenever you want, you can buy any player by paying its hostile clause. That sounds fair and realistic, however, I think if a player has spent all his career in a single team, and has the points needed for the hall of fame, it should be harder to buy that player because of that. If the player is attached to the team, it shouldn't be so easy to buy them. At least to double the hostile clause for the same amount, or apply any negotiation within teams for hostile clauses, to make it more realistic. I.E. I cannot imagine a Zanetti, a Bochini or a Riquelme (to choose some examples I'm familiar with) saying "I love this team I played so many years in, but screw you, I'm leaving for a team that payed all my hostile clause even if you don't want to, without listening any other offers you would make." IMO, it would make the game more realistic. Thanks! just pay him more to reflect what he means to your club! simple! |
02/07/2014 19:28 |
- Div/Gr | ||
Username
2015 msgs.
Best scorer
|
mrkxk said: Changeman FC said: Hi all, I wanted to suggest an improvement to hostile clauses in the game. Now, whenever you want, you can buy any player by paying its hostile clause. That sounds fair and realistic, however, I think if a player has spent all his career in a single team, and has the points needed for the hall of fame, it should be harder to buy that player because of that. If the player is attached to the team, it shouldn't be so easy to buy them. At least to double the hostile clause for the same amount, or apply any negotiation within teams for hostile clauses, to make it more realistic. I.E. I cannot imagine a Zanetti, a Bochini or a Riquelme (to choose some examples I'm familiar with) saying "I love this team I played so many years in, but screw you, I'm leaving for a team that payed all my hostile clause even if you don't want to, without listening any other offers you would make." IMO, it would make the game more realistic. Thanks! just pay him more to reflect what he means to your club! simple! +1 »»»» simple |
06/07/2014 04:08 |
A-TEAM★★ - Div2/Gr4 | ||
Username
171 msgs.
Substitute
|
+1 | 27/07/2014 06:14 |
- Div/Gr | ||
Username
127 msgs.
Substitute
|
-1 | 27/07/2014 15:56 |
- Div/Gr | ||
Username
3085 msgs.
Best scorer
|
I would have advice you to pay him more salary but that will surely affect your weekly charges.. Great idea (Y) +1 |
28/07/2014 07:41 |
- Div/Gr | ||