Go to page 1, 2
| Forum » Suggestions » Private Leagues | Date | |
|---|---|---|
|
Username
82 msgs.
Rookie
|
I think it would be better to have more options when creating private leagues i.e only teams within the division (i dont mean just the league you are in). Problem is if it is open all the big teams jump in and take all the prize money, win the league by a canter and no fun. Invitations take too much time for me. | 27/09/2013 17:14 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
2032 msgs.
Best scorer
|
Pl requires real activeness and good coordination. it doesn't take time provided you organise it well. -1 | 28/09/2013 12:29 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
672 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
As a coordinator I agree with the above post. However, I think that this could be a great idea if done right. My suggestion would be to implement this on a limited basis- that is, allow X number of "division only" groups before taking the option away, so everyone doesn't just make their own group, and that the groups must be full before the first game is played, or be disbanded, again to encourage fewer, but full groups instead of every new manager going out and creating a "division 6 only" group. | 30/09/2013 21:02 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
1058 msgs.
International
|
+1 | 11/10/2013 20:29 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
4213 msgs.
Best scorer
|
Marvel1 said: I think it would be better to have more options when creating private leagues i.e only teams within the division (i dont mean just the league you are in). Problem is if it is open all the big teams jump in and take all the prize money, win the league by a canter and no fun. Invitations take too much time for me. And Adding GBs to Prizes to Increase Seriousness and lessen Laziness(low effort). |
12/10/2013 09:09 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
224 msgs.
Substitute
|
You need to play against big team to know your weakness | 12/10/2013 23:04 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
3880 msgs.
Best scorer
|
Jurgen Kloppy said: Marvel1 said: I think it would be better to have more options when creating private leagues i.e only teams within the division (i dont mean just the league you are in). Problem is if it is open all the big teams jump in and take all the prize money, win the league by a canter and no fun. Invitations take too much time for me. And Adding GBs to Prizes to Increase Seriousness and lessen Laziness(low effort). Who provides the GBs? |
13/10/2013 00:09 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
4213 msgs.
Best scorer
|
@bowsey1986 said: Jurgen Kloppy said: Marvel1 said: I think it would be better to have more options when creating private leagues i.e only teams within the division (i dont mean just the league you are in). Problem is if it is open all the big teams jump in and take all the prize money, win the league by a canter and no fun. Invitations take too much time for me. And Adding GBs to Prizes to Increase Seriousness and lessen Laziness(low effort). Who provides the GBs? Every Participant. |
13/10/2013 01:14 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
525 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
I 100% support this. Marvel1 said: I think it would be better to have more options when creating private leagues i.e only teams within the division (i dont mean just the league you are in). Problem is if it is open all the big teams jump in and take all the prize money, win the league by a canter and no fun. Invitations take too much time for me. |
14/10/2013 21:24 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
525 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
Aruen said: As a coordinator I agree with the above post. However, I think that this could be a great idea if done right. My suggestion would be to implement this on a limited basis- that is, allow X number of "division only" groups before taking the option away, so everyone doesn't just make their own group, and that the groups must be full before the first game is played, or be disbanded, again to encourage fewer, but full groups instead of every new manager going out and creating a "division 6 only" group. you just killed it  |
14/10/2013 21:27 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
Go to page 1, 2
1
