Go to page 1
| Forum » Suggestions » Two suggestions(Teams interested tab.,offer a player( auction)) | Date | |
|---|---|---|
|
52 msgs.
Rookie
|
I don't know if these suggestions have been suggested. I don't care if these will not be implemented. In the player's profile I suggest that there should be a teams interested tab next to history,skills and etc.. With this feature, It will be nice to know what teams are interested in your player and easily negotiate/make a deal to them. One other suggestion I would make is you can offer a player in an auction. For example, there is an auction for a player. I would like to see "(team name) offered $3000+(player/s.)". I suggest this because their comes a time when you badly need that player. But you can't have him because your out of money. |
02/02/2013 06:25 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
642 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
ooh i see you mean something like this. X Team sells a player B to Team Y while in return team Y pays 30 mill and a player C to balance the deal. Player B =30m+Player C sounds good to me.  Edited by KSHITIJSCHOLESUSFC 02-02-2013 07:12 |
02/02/2013 07:11 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
2608 msgs.
Best scorer
|
2nd idea used to exist, we used to be able to do multi-offers but only for players below 60 average and as more people started to get 60+ players that tool became unused. Then the rule about not being able to sell juniors (14-15years old) per TA agreement came and this led to players above 15 and under 60 average being the only guys able to be sold by multi-offers. Seeing that this was a small portion of the players (players in squads of active managers) they removed the option. Not sure why only players with less than 60 average couldn't be sold, maybe because that tool wasn't really advanced with prices being unstable and this would have led to a lot of people helping friends by selling to cheap or being helped by selling too high which is considered against the rules...And I am sure this would have happened, the tool wasn't even taking forecast and progression into account, not even position of players and we all know those strongly affect prices. Not even sure it was taking age into account, the tool just wouldn't let many people make "fair" transactions. Not against the idea, just wanted to give you a bit of history class . Maybe this will help you make your ideas good enough for admins to make it happen again. |
02/02/2013 07:33 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
Go to page 1
1
