Go to page 1, 2
  Forum » Suggestions » AWARDS - BEST 11 OF Round Date
Fiscal
3449 msgs.
Best scorer
Dirtyboi said:
illex said:
Let's use a real life scenario. Let's say Manchester United gets relegated but they're able to keep most of their players. So now you've got guys like Robin Van Persie and Wayne Rooney playing in the championship, they're going to obviously dominate and be better than most players in the league, so if there was best XI of the day in the Championship, these guys would probably always be in the best XI.

I sort of see your point because a Portsmouth striker scoring 4 goals in a game is more impressive than Wayne Rooney not really trying so hard and scoring 1 goal.

The only thing you can really do is train/buy better players in hopes that your guys will hit the board ahead of the other teams players.


But is it not the best 11 of the week consist of best performers in league, rather than just the biggest names. Here is an example :
http://www.premierleague.com/en-gb/players/ea-sports-ppi-team-of-the-week.html


I know, but if you look at his situation, the guy he's talking about has 60+ average players and division 5 is typically 45-50 average players, so generally speaking the other guy's players are probably going to play better week in and week out. I understand your point, and it'd probably make more sense to have it be based on who played the highest number of points above their average. You can't really go on intangibles like you can in real life here, because there aren't really any intangibles with the game. As eam said, the best award is another 3 points on the board. 		04/01/2013 22:23
  - Div/Gr
30 msgs.
Child's coach
 i am not just talking about avg. yes my players average 40-50 most and other of which i talking about is 60 or more .. but still yesterday that team lost 1-3 and my team won 6-0, and still that teams 8 players were selected as best 11. This dosent make logic of the selection. They lost and still are in best 11?? How it can be??

As earlier example by one of friends of premierleague team of week, there are certain avg players who are in the list because they performed well on the day because of which their team won..
only exceptional player who might have performed extremely well despite his team losing might have been selected.
thats case understood but here we have all losing team players selected due to high averages and not performance on the day..

So this needs correction.. 		05/01/2013 05:44
  - Div/Gr
Username
1288 msgs.
International
illex said:
Dirtyboi said:
illex said:
Let's use a real life scenario. Let's say Manchester United gets relegated but they're able to keep most of their players. So now you've got guys like Robin Van Persie and Wayne Rooney playing in the championship, they're going to obviously dominate and be better than most players in the league, so if there was best XI of the day in the Championship, these guys would probably always be in the best XI.

I sort of see your point because a Portsmouth striker scoring 4 goals in a game is more impressive than Wayne Rooney not really trying so hard and scoring 1 goal.

The only thing you can really do is train/buy better players in hopes that your guys will hit the board ahead of the other teams players.


But is it not the best 11 of the week consist of best performers in league, rather than just the biggest names. Here is an example :
http://www.premierleague.com/en-gb/players/ea-sports-ppi-team-of-the-week.html


I know, but if you look at his situation, the guy he's talking about has 60+ average players and division 5 is typically 45-50 average players, so generally speaking the other guy's players are probably going to play better week in and week out. I understand your point, and it'd probably make more sense to have it be based on who played the highest number of points above their average. You can't really go on intangibles like you can in real life here, because there aren't really any intangibles with the game. As eam said, the best award is another 3 points on the board.


Yeah what eam said i totally agree with. I also don't care much about it, except, sometime have a good laugh. I only wish the awards been a bit different. Beside I was just pointing out that your scenario was not totally right

05/01/2013 06:48
  - Div/Gr
Username
391 msgs.
First-team player
illex said:
Let's use a real life scenario. Let's say Manchester United gets relegated but they're able to keep most of their players. So now you've got guys like Robin Van Persie and Wayne Rooney playing in the championship, they're going to obviously dominate and be better than most players in the league, so if there was best XI of the day in the Championship, these guys would probably always be in the best XI.

I sort of see your point because a Portsmouth striker scoring 4 goals in a game is more impressive than Wayne Rooney not really trying so hard and scoring 1 goal.

The only thing you can really do is train/buy better players in hopes that your guys will hit the board ahead of the other teams players.

why did you use man utd?Arsenal or liverpool would have been better. 		06/01/2013 14:12
  - Div/Gr
     
Go to page 1, 2
2