Forum » Suggestions » school players contract | Date | |
---|---|---|
Username
1560 msgs.
International
|
there is no transfer agreement for junior or school players and no direct buy for them as well..i dont think thats a very good thing. these days people loose a lot of money when they sell their high prog players except for those who have golden balls to indicate prog and FC as well as would always be online to advertise in the forum..imagine selling 85prog rim for just 300k!!!!!!! most school players come with very low release clause and usually most managers would put them on auction with low direct auction so as to buy them back and give them a higher salary before putting them on auction starting at their own convinient price..but now you have to risk starting from 0 or the release clause of the school player whom you might end up selling for a lot less. i would like to suggestt that the direct buy option be reactivated for junior players or an option where they can be offfered a new contract upon promotion be included. thanks | 11/12/2012 10:38 |
- Div/Gr | ||
Username
84 msgs.
Rookie
|
+1 Totally right !! | 11/12/2012 10:50 |
- Div/Gr | ||
Username
2897 msgs.
Best scorer
|
You may want to try taking a screen shot of his progression while he's still in the school and post it on the market forum a few days before and while he is on sale. Edited by @sabrefan62 11-12-2012 13:38 |
11/12/2012 13:37 |
- Div/Gr | ||
1382 msgs.
International
|
@sabrefan62 said: You may want to try taking a screen shot of his progression while he's still in the school and post it on the market forum a few days before and while he is on sale. Edited by @sabrefan62 11-12-2012 13:38 Agreed. You have to be creative when promoting a sale. Also, make your school public so people can view what's inside. Its proven, the more effort in selling the higher the reward. |
11/12/2012 15:07 |
- Div/Gr | ||
Username
1399 msgs.
International
|
but even then its futile.I hav had to sell many of my plrs in loss as i couldnt publish their FC.so its a +1 frm me. | 11/12/2012 15:22 |
- Div/Gr | ||
Username
1560 msgs.
International
|
this is not about being creative..its about doing what is right..just as someone said, its to force people to buy golden balls which brings money to the game as you could easily resign your players and remove the r sign and also write their fc and prog to promote sales..now what about those who don't have golden balls and can't buy even if they'd love to? | 11/12/2012 15:44 |
- Div/Gr | ||
1382 msgs.
International
|
We have had discussion similar to this already and very recent. I see your point but Forecasting is a privilege not a right. Big difference here. Its your right to know the progress of players. Its your privilege to buy gbs and in return use it for something such as FC. If you can't buy gbs whose fault is it? Not the developers of the game who use the most convenient of modern technology for payment processing. |
11/12/2012 17:10 |
- Div/Gr | ||
1382 msgs.
International
|
Double post from cell sorry. Edited by cmccourt 11-12-2012 17:14 |
11/12/2012 17:10 |
- Div/Gr | ||
Fiscal
6832 msgs.
Golden Ball
|
One big problem with GBs is the countries that can't buy them ie: Nigeria, But I don't think the devs will change the school players because of this as they will lose out on money for the rest of the world, We get a great free game but the devs need to make some money, I suppose they could get rid of GBs and have a subscription fee, or a initial fee, the devs don't want to take this route so they charge for extra features |
11/12/2012 18:54 |
Steel City - Div4/Gr12 | ||
Username
388 msgs.
First-team player
|
cmccourt said: We have had discussion similar to this already and very recent.... http://en3.strikermanager.com/foros/hilo.php?id=316318 and http://en3.strikermanager.com/foros/hilo.php?id=320974 eamwilson said: One big problem with GBs is the countries that can't buy them ie: Nigeria, But I don't think the devs will change the school players because of this as they will lose out on money for the rest of the world, We get a great free game but the devs need to make some money, I suppose they could get rid of GBs and have a subscription fee, or a initial fee, the devs don't want to take this route so they charge for extra features but agree with eam. Extra work and less income for dev --->Will never be implemented Edited by SpiX 11-12-2012 20:28 |
11/12/2012 20:27 |
- Div/Gr | ||