Go to page 1, 2
| Forum » Suggestions » Fix Line-Up Screw Ups | Date | |
|---|---|---|
|
413 msgs.
First-team player
|
So a player in my starting 11 was bought via direct buy right before my game today. And of course, as a result, my entire line-up is screwed up, with my CF in the back field playing right back, and some midfielder or something playing forward. Please stop wasting time fixing clerical errors and use your resources to repair actual structural problems in your game. This is ridiculous. |
30/11/2012 21:08 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
2897 msgs.
Best scorer
|
With all due respect, you shouldn't have had a player on direct buy in your starting lineup. | 30/11/2012 21:16 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
413 msgs.
First-team player
|
@sabrefan62 said: With all due respect, you shouldn't have had a player on direct buy in your starting lineup. With all due respect, I shouldn't have to mother hen my line-up throughout the day to make sure the system hasn't made nonsense displacements. The effect is the same whether a player is purchased direct buy, auction, hostiled, or demoted following a temporary promotion. Stop telling players to make duct-tape solutions for problems the game designers created and have left untended. It needs to be fixed. Edited by Anonymous01 30-11-2012 21:30 |
30/11/2012 21:29 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
2822 msgs.
Best scorer
|
Anonymous01 said: @sabrefan62 said: With all due respect, you shouldn't have had a player on direct buy in your starting lineup. With all due respect, I shouldn't have to mother hen my line-up throughout the day to make sure the system hasn't made nonsense displacements. The effect is the same whether a player is purchased direct buy, auction, hostiled, or demoted following a temporary promotion. Stop telling players to make duct-tape solutions for problems the game designers created and have left untended. It needs to be fixed. Edited by Anonymous01 30-11-2012 21:30 No need to back-sass the @... @sabrefan is right because if you were to have him on direct buy in your starting line up, then at least take him off auction! |
30/11/2012 21:38 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
413 msgs.
First-team player
|
PeterP1999 said: Anonymous01 said: @sabrefan62 said: With all due respect, you shouldn't have had a player on direct buy in your starting lineup. With all due respect, I shouldn't have to mother hen my line-up throughout the day to make sure the system hasn't made nonsense displacements. The effect is the same whether a player is purchased direct buy, auction, hostiled, or demoted following a temporary promotion. Stop telling players to make duct-tape solutions for problems the game designers created and have left untended. It needs to be fixed. Edited by Anonymous01 30-11-2012 21:30 No need to back-sass the @... @sabrefan is right because if you were to have him on direct buy in your starting line up, then at least take him off auction! Back sass? I and many others are paying for a service here that has structural flaws that are being ignored while the coders are fixing spelling errors. You wanna lick the boots of the people you pay money to for a poor service, that's your business. I won't try get in your way. Kindly show me the same courtesy. As I said, this has nothing to do with my line-up and sales. The line-up would have been just as a screwed up if the player had been hostiled. And worse, how is this any more difficult a coding issue than copying and pasting the Automatic line-up language to the section concerning sold or demoted players? The problem needs to be fixed. Now sass that. |
30/11/2012 21:49 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
1399 msgs.
International
|
with all due respect i agree with sabrefan...bugs cant get fixed in one day.whole programming codes need to be changes.and you knew there's a bug like this then try to remove the player from line-up.why is he even there if you are selling him.what if someone direct buy him in middle of game?its a managers duty to set his line-up.in real life too if a leaves coach has to tell who will play in his place.they just dont do it themselves.dont think i am favouring devs here.in fact i think they are slow to approach some bugs.they know about this bug.but hey..fixing bugs takes time and till then we must adjust to them. Edited by super striker king 01-12-2012 02:25 |
01/12/2012 02:14 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
164 msgs.
Substitute
|
how about making auctioned players can't get into line up. i think the code is similar to red carded players. | 01/12/2012 07:44 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
830 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
I am new to the game so I might be missing something, but I agree that it doesn't work as it should be working. Yesterday I used adv. tactics. Before that I have spend almost 1 hour to prepare everything and double sheck it after it. Idea was that one of my DFMs go on CF spot when tactics change from 3-5-2, to 3-4-3 and then the new CF from the bench replace that DFM. What happend in reallity is that my OM and CF went behind, basicly my whole suad has shuffled up. |
01/12/2012 12:35 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
1399 msgs.
International
|
Miroslav"Ćiro"Blažević said: I am new to the game so I might be missing something, but I agree that it doesn't work as it should be working. Yesterday I used adv. tactics. Before that I have spend almost 1 hour to prepare everything and double sheck it after it. Idea was that one of my DFMs go on CF spot when tactics change from 3-5-2, to 3-4-3 and then the new CF from the bench replace that DFM. What happend in reallity is that my OM and CF went behind, basicly my whole suad has shuffled up. you dont need to do so to make changes in game.suppose if you want to change from 3-4-3 to 4-3-3 first copy the formation so that you have two 3-4-3 and then take any of mids back.now make substitution of a def in place of that mid using advance tactics.this way positions dont get messed up.  Edited by super striker king 01-12-2012 12:47 |
01/12/2012 12:45 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
830 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
I dont know what you are saying, but here is what I did. I have made 3-5-2 formation with my strongest lin up. I saved it. I have made another formation 3-4-3 with same players, playing in same positions as in other one, accept for one DFM who I put to play at CF position. Then I checked 3-5-2 line up again, it was shuffeled because I was making that other one. I rearange it again to look like it looked the first time. Then I went to adv. tactics and made "if down by one" choice, switch tactics, and I chose the one I've been arranging(3-4-3), and I set one sub. that DFM that went up to be replaced with one more CF. To summarise; the problem is that when ever you are doing new formation line-up, other ones that you have already saved get shuffeld. They should be permanently fixed as saved. |
01/12/2012 13:19 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
Go to page 1, 2
1
