| Forum » General » PL Rankings Season 8 Week 9 | Date | |
|---|---|---|
|
Are you interested in weekly ranking posts?
|
||
|
Username
412 msgs.
First-team player
|
Teams highlighted in purple do not have 14 members. Teams highlighted in red do not have a player in the top 125, but are active and asked to be ranked. http://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AnEvrKNGf4I0dFFmd3BNMkVFbHI1b2N4V3dCa2ZoWmc I have changed the way I collect data, so if it looks wrong please help me fix it. The new way should make it so I can easily do weekly updates. Top 10 Overall Ranking (Team Rank Avg * Division Avg) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 01. Hardcore´s (Vol. 8) - Grupo 2 02. No entiendo ingles 1ª vDiv. 03. Infamous 14 (+1) 04. BEST 100 4･0 PRIVATE LEAGUE (-1) 05. The Brotherhood (Primus Circle) (+1) 06. Shadow Masters (@FC Ubuntu) (+1) 07. The Ultimate League VI (+1) 08. No intiendo ingles - 2ª division (+2) 09. Hardcore´s (Vol. 8) - Grupo 1 10. † THE UBERCOOL LEAGUE † (+1) Top 10 Team Rank Average ---------------------------------------- 01. Hardcore´s (Vol. 8) - Grupo 2 02. BEST 100 4･0 PRIVATE LEAGUE 03. No entiendo ingles 1ª vDiv. 04. Infamous 14 05. The Brotherhood (Primus Circle) (+1) 06. Shadow Masters (@FC Ubuntu) (+1) 07. The Ultimate League VI (+1) 08. No intiendo ingles - 2ª division (+1) 09. † THE UBERCOOL LEAGUE † (+1) 010. Hardcore´s (Vol. 8) - Grupo 1 (+1) Top 10 Division Average ----------------------------------- 01. Hardcore´s (Vol. 8) - Grupo 2 02. No entiendo ingles 1ª vDiv. (+1) 03. Infamous 14 (+1) 04. International 55 League (-2) 05. The Brotherhood (Primus Circle) 06. Shadow Masters (@FC Ubuntu) 07. Hardcore´s (Vol. 8) - Grupo 1 08. BEST 100 4･0 PRIVATE LEAGUE 09. No intiendo ingles - 2ª division 010. The Ultimate League VI (+1) Top 5 Overall Improved --------------------------------- 01. ESPAÑOLES I [31.97%] 02. The Brotherhood (Vortex Circle) [30.51%] 03. RPL BLACK EDITION [23.69%] 04. LIGA INDONESIA [23.07%] 05. Ocean's 14 [22.02%] Teams Dropping In Performance --------------------------------------------------- 01. International 55 League [-2015.22%] 02. BEST 100 4･0 PRIVATE LEAGUE [-4.35%] |
23/11/2012 21:14 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
3547 msgs.
Best scorer
|
LOLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL at Pirate | 23/11/2012 23:21 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
2822 msgs.
Best scorer
|
Uruguay1950 said: LOLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL at Pirate OMG, I thought I was supposed to want to be in pirates. I guessed wrong xD |
24/11/2012 02:20 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
1382 msgs.
International
|
Umm... I think its really important. It adds that extra competitiveness that's missing. Seeing how your pl stands up against others shows who has better strategy, incomes and gamer experience. Which is needed if one plans on making it to the top. | 24/11/2012 03:19 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
2960 msgs.
Best scorer
|
Uruguay1950 said: LOLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL at Pirate pirate sux http://en3.strikermanager.com/liga.php?id_liga=37402 |
24/11/2012 04:11 |
| Mr. Q17 - Div1/Gr1 | ||
|
Username
412 msgs.
First-team player
|
Pirates still in top 5 from a division perspective, which arguably could be the most relevant metric for dominance. I think it would be foolish to consider them as sux.  |
24/11/2012 04:15 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
2960 msgs.
Best scorer
|
dude belive me they sux...only 1-2-3 place in div.1 and won last 2 SC | 24/11/2012 04:17 |
| Mr. Q17 - Div1/Gr1 | ||
|
Username
3363 msgs.
Best scorer
|
dneighbors said: I have changed the way I collect data, so if it looks wrong please help me fix it. You need to have a Division factor brought in - your calcs dont make sense. 4 pirates in top 5 of Div 1 and Int 55 is not in the top 10??? Also as long as you use the developers team rankings, nobody will take this seriously - use division positions and striker cup only. So if a team is in Div 1 - ave/position/points (not sure what you want to use) are multiplied by 4 Div 2 - multiplied by 3 Div 3 - multiplied by 2 Div 4-7 - as is Cup - maybe points gained for each round attained, points going up exponentially each round. A PL ranking should show the true performance of its members in the wider Striker arena. |
24/11/2012 07:52 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
3059 msgs.
Best scorer
|
GunnerNic said: dneighbors said: I have changed the way I collect data, so if it looks wrong please help me fix it. You need to have a Division factor brought in - your calcs dont make sense. 4 pirates in top 5 of Div 1 and Int 55 is not in the top 10??? Also as long as you use the developers team rankings, nobody will take this seriously - use division positions and striker cup only. So if a team is in Div 1 - ave/position/points (not sure what you want to use) are multiplied by 4 Div 2 - multiplied by 3 Div 3 - multiplied by 2 Div 4-7 - as is Cup - maybe points gained for each round attained, points going up exponentially each round. A PL ranking should show the true performance of its members in the wider Striker arena. +1 on the idea but something cant work out, how do you expect to get the real average of each team? i think only position/points can be used |
24/11/2012 08:09 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
412 msgs.
First-team player
|
GunnerNic said: You need to have a Division factor brought in - your calcs dont make sense. 4 pirates in top 5 of Div 1 and Int 55 is not in the top 10??? Also as long as you use the developers team rankings, nobody will take this seriously - use division positions and striker cup only. So if a team is in Div 1 - ave/position/points (not sure what you want to use) are multiplied by 4 Div 2 - multiplied by 3 Div 3 - multiplied by 2 Div 4-7 - as is Cup - maybe points gained for each round attained, points going up exponentially each round. A PL ranking should show the true performance of its members in the wider Striker arena. People complained there was no division factor before, so I added that. Now it seems you want that division factor weighted? Currently Div 4 is 4 times as bad as Div 1. You are suggesting that it should be 16 times as bad. I think that is perhaps a little bit skewed but am not opposed to adding some weighting as getting to Div 1/2/3 is difficult. I think that team rank should be used as the developers use it as method of dealing with performance over multiple seasons. Division ranks are limited to performance in a single season, so why important they are not the end all. Unfortunately the screens for pulling striker cup information are more headache than they are worth so pulling cup data is currently out (for now). Currently lower is better so... Div 1 = 1 Div 2 = 2 Div 3 = 3 etc You are advocating for Div 1 = 1 Div 2 = 4 Div 3 = 9 Div 4 = 16 Div 5 = 25 Div 6 = 36 Div 7 = 49 Perhaps Div 1 = 0.5 (x .5) Div 2 = 2 (x 1) Div 3 = 4.5 (x 1.5) Div 4 = 8 (x 2.0) Div 5 = 10 (x 2.0) Div 6 = 12 (x 2.0) Div 7 = 14 (x 2.0) |
24/11/2012 08:49 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
1
