| Forum » Suggestions » Owners | Date | |
|---|---|---|
|
Do you like the idea of having owners?
|
||
|
Username
2019 msgs.
Best scorer
|
I think that having owners to the club would be a pretty good i dea. Depending on how rich he is he could give u an X amount of money every week or something and make objectives that u have to complete. Just a thought. what do you think? Edited by kkii567 25-11-2012 14:23 |
20/11/2012 23:32 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
887 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
good idea | 21/11/2012 06:48 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
391 msgs.
First-team player
|
Bad idea | 21/11/2012 07:11 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
2019 msgs.
Best scorer
|
bestboss5 said: Bad idea lol wanna explain why?^_^ |
21/11/2012 12:29 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
2149 msgs.
Best scorer
|
and what happens if you cant meet the objectives, do i get fired? I have spent last 1 year building a team, if don't meet the owners objective for 3 weeks, do i deserve to get the boot. i like my autocratic rule on the club I manage. Making a game as close to reality is a good idea, but perhaps sometimes, for the sake of gaming community, reality might take second preference. This i believe happens to be one such case. |
21/11/2012 12:51 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
2019 msgs.
Best scorer
|
Spade said: and what happens if you cant meet the objectives, do i get fired? I have spent last 1 year building a team, if don't meet the owners objective for 3 weeks, do i deserve to get the boot. i like my autocratic rule on the club I manage. Making a game as close to reality is a good idea, but perhaps sometimes, for the sake of gaming community, reality might take second preference. This i believe happens to be one such case. hmmmm.. good point lets just say if u complete an objective it gives u 500 xp and if u dont u dont get any  |
21/11/2012 12:52 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
391 msgs.
First-team player
|
I'll get back to you when i have an explanation. | 21/11/2012 12:53 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
2019 msgs.
Best scorer
|
bestboss5 said: I'll get back to you when i have an explanation. haha ok |
21/11/2012 12:54 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
961 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
I think it's a good idea. For instance, teams in lower divisions like in 6 and 7 would benefit greatly from an owner who offers an extra source of income to help jumpstart their new teams. It can also be used as a balance to stop teams in higher divions from hoarding cash by having the owner take a certain amount so their would be more competitiveness in the game. Overall, it's a broad idea that can be expanded and polished up. If anything, owners should serve as a balance to help equalize teams from having one become too strong to the point of unfairness. It will also allow stability and adds that realistic feature like football clubs really have. | 22/11/2012 00:11 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
21587 msgs.
Golden Ball
|
Anyway,an increase in sponsor bonus will definitely solve this if its going to happen at all... I dont suscribe to that of the owner or what giving you money weekly.....what about your stadium revenue.. |
22/11/2012 04:06 |
| 🦊3773™ - Div2/Gr1 | ||
1
