Go to page 1, 2
| Forum » Suggestions » No formation limits | Date | |
|---|---|---|
|
342 msgs.
First-team player
|
There should be no such thing as invalid tactics...Spain plays with no strikers...why can't we? | 30/10/2012 00:36 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
2608 msgs.
Best scorer
|
I am still thinking about the possible high and lows of this, I would like to hear what other people think. This will certainly give the managers more abilities to come up with the weirdest and most unrealistic formations possible. That can be good and bad in my opinion. But will it make more managers rage compared to those happy... By the way, that would really help many managers to train 11 juniors of the exact same position with maximum motivation... sending farming to a new level hehe Edited by @patient 30-10-2012 06:45 |
30/10/2012 06:42 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
6256 msgs.
Golden Ball
|
I would definately play a 4-1-5 formation using mids as strikers. It would certainly end inflation for strikers. Plus one for me. Or maybe 0 defenders and a very extreme offside trap, utilising 4 dfms as defenders. You could really screw the game up. Btw they do have attackers op. |
30/10/2012 18:14 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
84 msgs.
Rookie
|
I agree it would be great, in the real matchs, nothing forbid managers to put 10 strikers or defenders... We could be able to do the same thing |
31/10/2012 23:26 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
56 msgs.
Rookie
|
would be nice to be able to dispense with the forwards in tactics, as you said the Spanish team has played matches without a striker but it mandatory to play with people of average to below, to avoid malfunction and excessive gambling defenses. | 01/11/2012 00:38 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
413 msgs.
First-team player
|
grantis45 said: I would definately play a 4-1-5 formation using mids as strikers. It would certainly end inflation for strikers. Plus one for me. Or maybe 0 defenders and a very extreme offside trap, utilising 4 dfms as defenders. You could really screw the game up. Btw they do have attackers op. Great minds . . . |
01/11/2012 01:45 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
391 msgs.
First-team player
|
4 dmf-6 om.nice line up for me. | 01/11/2012 02:21 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
1184 msgs.
International
|
I do see the need for invalid tactics but maybe just making it so you can have 3 players if same position instead of 2  |
05/03/2013 13:20 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Fiscal
3449 msgs.
Best scorer
|
I think the 2 per position rule would still need to stay in place, (I could see formations like 6 RIM/LIM and 4 DFM being too powerful) but I think it would be interesting to allow people to play whatever combination of players in seniors that they wanted. It also gives more flexibility to teams when they have low stamina in certain positions. However I think the current rules still need to apply to juniors, as that could cause unfair training. |
05/03/2013 15:25 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
297 msgs.
First-team player
|
At least it should be made possible for junior tactics. They could make two formation systems, one for senior and one for junior, so for junior we can train more players (even if that is also not realistic). |
05/03/2013 21:06 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
Go to page 1, 2
1
