Go to page 1
| Forum » Suggestions » fix rankings | Date | |
|---|---|---|
|
1394 msgs.
International
|
well at least remove all bot teams then i suggest each manager gets x points just for logging in each week or day - this way inactive managers will slide down rankings rather than staying in their frankly undeserved postion on another note damn arsenal were close how does van persie feel after that miss well done wenger still a genius |
07/03/2012 00:40 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
2108 msgs.
Best scorer
|
If they were that good that you can't pass them then maybe you shouldn't. | 07/03/2012 00:46 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
1394 msgs.
International
|
it just sux looking at teams who are inactive have team ave of like 10 and still higher than me  maybe i am missing something - improving your team and showing for games is maybe the wrong way to go about management |
07/03/2012 01:02 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
6256 msgs.
Golden Ball
|
If they dropped down the rankings then new teams would never gain enough xp to break 8k xp. You gain xp based on how high up the ranking the manager you beat is. | 07/03/2012 13:29 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
2108 msgs.
Best scorer
|
@grantis45 said: If they dropped down the rankings then new teams would never gain enough xp to break 8k xp. You gain xp based on how high up the ranking the manager you beat is. Is this a cold hard fact now? I mean we've always assumed it's true, but do we have cold hard evidence that if the teams play entirely new teams they'll take forever to hit 8k? I only ask because then SM needs to keep track of all the new groups it makes, and think about throwing some of the more skilled bots like the ghosts of satkan, valarbaloo, and Kashulo_ML into them before filling them up with unexperienced players. Edited by hewhoamareismyself 07-03-2012 14:35 |
07/03/2012 14:05 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
6256 msgs.
Golden Ball
|
It's only circumstantial observations from what I've seen waiting to hostile 8k teams | 07/03/2012 14:58 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
Go to page 1
1
