| Forum » FAQ & Tutorials » The Economics of Striker Manager | Date | |
|---|---|---|
|
Did you find this useful?
|
||
|
1382 msgs.
International
|
@Lifeguard said: Are deposit interests rising dee? i just deposited money and noticed it at ~9.5% interest.... It seems so. im at 9.855%. |
10/04/2012 05:37 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
608 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
On phone ro cnt reply properly. In a nutshell... Yes. Cheak my post in "deposit interest" thread ingeneral forum | 10/04/2012 05:38 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
608 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
Any chance of getting the Paper Sticky'd or put in the FAQs? | 26/05/2012 17:26 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Fiscal
2159 msgs.
Best scorer
|
Sticky'd and moved to FAQ's | 26/05/2012 18:43 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
16 msgs.
Cadet
|
good work | 07/08/2012 14:33 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
8 msgs.
Cadet
|
Yea great 1 make it hard 2 stay on top nt d oda way round..... | 20/08/2012 12:35 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
4993 msgs.
Best scorer
|
Dee12345 said: However, during the course of this debate, there is one factor that can be executed: Steady release of System Bot Players. The players can be auctioned from £0, and replaced with standard players to ensure that there is no forfeiture of games. The money spent on these players, would IMMEDIATELY begin to take money out of the game. something occurred to me today, i was thinking about the superstar junior auctions & taking money out of the game in the way Dee describes here. why are the un-resigned juniors made available to hostile each season? it strikes me that a sure fire way of contributing to inflation is distributing a bunch of high prog, high fc players among the upper divs for next to nothing. i expect this has already been suggested, but why not put them onto the market along with the out of contract system bot players? |
21/08/2012 15:40 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
112 msgs.
Substitute
|
Is Useful | 26/08/2012 16:23 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
88 msgs.
Rookie
|
This was a very nice analysis. I would like to point out that inflation can be warded off by simply controlling the number of "tickets sold" As we increase the number of players, so is the imaginary number of fan attendance increasing. If we make the number of fantasy fans a constant, then the leading teams in the big divisions will have to share a finite number of fans. There is no need for additional taxes - we pay taxes when we buy a player, and we have stadium maintenance costs weekly. It is a very interesting conversation because it brings out each person's character and how they think about economics and taxation. Thanks |
27/08/2012 20:17 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
1382 msgs.
International
|
Nota bad point to reduce ticket attendance, but stadium income is really only there to help pay weekly expenses. The real money comes from the multple buying and selling of players. | 27/08/2012 21:11 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
5
