Go to page 1
| Forum » Suggestions » Striker Cup Stadiums | Date | |
|---|---|---|
|
Should the home team in a Cup game be played at the better stadium of the two teams?
|
||
|
Fiscal
2159 msgs.
Best scorer
|
Hello - a suggestion i think many people would be happy with... I think that the home team in the Striker Cup should be the team with the better stadium or stadium that has better revenue so as to benefit both teams playing in the cup. It makes no sense for div 2-4 teams to play away at div 6 or 7 for the entirety of their striker cup (eg. 5 or 6 games all away at lower division teams) just to play a much better team in the next round, and get absolutely killed with nothing to show money-wise for their journey. And remember - both teams get half the revenue so it would be better for both teams involved, not just the home team. Edited by Lifeguard 18-01-2012 23:02 |
18/01/2012 22:57 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Fiscal
2955 msgs.
Best scorer
|
I agree, I was thinking about making a thread about this too lol! Make it so @'s! |
18/01/2012 23:00 |
| AFCB Mercenaries - Div3/Gr6 | ||
|
Username
211 msgs.
Substitute
|
It'd be too hard to do I believe It automatically assumes the left team is home in the fixture, but if they could program ''whoever has biggest stadium gets put first in the fixture' then it'd be possible  All down to whether they can be bothered, but I'm sure an @ can see a flaw in it  |
18/01/2012 23:07 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
5633 msgs.
Golden Ball
|
redones said: It'd be too hard to do I believe It automatically assumes the left team is home in the fixture, but if they could program ''whoever has biggest stadium gets put first in the fixture' then it'd be possible All down to whether they can be bothered, but I'm sure an @ can see a flaw in it Haha not a flaw, just something to think about. The home team still gets sponsor and billboard money so it's not half and half really |
19/01/2012 13:57 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
Go to page 1
1
