Go to page 1
| Forum » Suggestions » Home Advantage | Date | |
|---|---|---|
|
Should Striker Cup finals be played on neutral ground?
|
||
|
Username
264 msgs.
First-team player
|
Does these game really have home advantage? If yes, then I think Striker Cup finals should be played on neutral ground. | 21/12/2011 13:36 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
2608 msgs.
Best scorer
|
I don't mind neutral ground but what revenue would the teams be getting? At least in "normal" stadiums revenue is divided in half. It is better if game is played in the "best" stadium Edited by patient 22-12-2011 09:16 |
22/12/2011 09:14 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
608 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
patient said: I don't mind neutral ground but what revenue would the teams be getting? At least in "normal" stadiums revenue is divided in half. It is better if game is played in the "best" stadium Edited by patient 22-12-2011 09:16 They could design SM's very own version of Wembley! Used only for Cup finals  |
22/12/2011 19:22 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
3547 msgs.
Best scorer
|
Why Wembley ? Why not Stade De France or Marecana ^_^ | 22/12/2011 19:52 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
264 msgs.
First-team player
|
Wembley is well equipped. | 22/12/2011 19:56 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
241 msgs.
Substitute
|
Or use my tomato field...  |
23/12/2011 10:48 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
264 msgs.
First-team player
|
Hahahahaha | 23/12/2011 10:52 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
212 msgs.
Substitute
|
I think they should use the best user built stadium (assuming it doesn't belong to the two finalist!) | 23/12/2011 12:14 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
1016 msgs.
International
|
imaging if they used a neutral stadium belonging to 1 of the manager in this game dont you think the revenue will be split into 3. The 2 finalist and the owner of the stadium. | 24/12/2011 08:37 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
Go to page 1
1
