| Forum » Doubts and questions » Schools | Date | |
|---|---|---|
|
Username
212 msgs.
Substitute
|
Uruguay1950 said: Uruguay and Netherland are best ^_^ Edited by Uruguay1950 22-12-2011 22:52 Pretty much. Except, I have ignored the one key fact, Uruguay, produces player who look like Sally Gunnel and racist buggers like Suarez!  |
22/12/2011 23:14 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
5205 msgs.
Golden Ball
|
You might notice that most of the best players in the game are German, some Brazilian, some English, some Italian, some Spanish. Whether they came from a school is another question  . I have not seen a 70+ Netherlands player, have you? |
22/12/2011 23:45 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
212 msgs.
Substitute
|
@CelloG said: You might notice that most of the best players in the game are German, some Brazilian, some English, some Italian, some Spanish. Whether they came from a school is another question . I have not seen a 70+ Netherlands player, have you?Absolutely true, I guess there is a lot of player development. It could be to do with training etc. My analysis was based purely on what value do you get for your money. In terms of the best ultimate quality, I guess population size will have something to do with. As well as frequency, clearly if you produce players more regularly, you are more likely to produce two quality players. |
22/12/2011 23:50 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
313 msgs.
First-team player
|
ghostdawg, sorry, but could you clarify what, in order from best to least, are the best 6 schools to create in excellent? Thanks |
23/12/2011 02:57 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
212 msgs.
Substitute
|
fredonon said: ghostdawg, sorry, but could you clarify what, in order from best to least, are the best 6 schools to create in excellent? Thanks The best value for money : 1. Uruguay. Best value for money interms of the quality you get. (Costs barely over 3.2m to build and you get 60% Country quality) 2. Switzerland. Again, excellent school will cost about 7m and you get 70% country quality. 3. Portugal & Croatia, 13.1m to build, country quality of 80% 4. Netherlands. 22m in build cost, but you get a country with 100%. This is then followed by Cameroon, Ghana, Ivory Coast, Argentina, England, Spain and France. However, the top 5 are those countries listed above, they are cheap and they offer real country quality. Have said this, I do not have any schools, so this purely based on cost vs country quality analysis. |
23/12/2011 11:07 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
160 msgs.
Substitute
|
Have said this, I do not have any schools, so this purely based on cost vs country quality analysis. ghostdawg is only analysing its left for anybody to use his statistic to judge in building thanks ghostdawg |
23/12/2011 11:37 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
212 msgs.
Substitute
|
Indeed. It seems you must have done similar analysis. It is no accident you have Excellent schools in Portugal and Netherlands, care to tell me what sort of players you are getting from there? | 23/12/2011 11:43 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
160 msgs.
Substitute
|
ha ha ha... They are great. 74 min prog. But the days are between 15day 2 in a month 6youth a season. No commercial value. Only good for future purpose | 23/12/2011 12:19 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
212 msgs.
Substitute
|
That makes sense. I don't think anyone should open a school with the intent of making money. The point is to provide players for your junior team. Develop them to a start and then consider selling them on. So your return on invest will be over a period 2-5 seasons. I repeat the assertions of others, if you intend to earn money in the short term, build your stadium. If you intend to earn money in the longer term, build a school. |
23/12/2011 12:29 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
34 msgs.
Child's coach
|
Edited by Imray 23-12-2011 12:31 |
23/12/2011 12:31 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
2
