Go to page 1
  Forum » Doubts and questions » Concerning Zone vs Man to Man Stamina usage... Date
Username
1117 msgs.
International
Another q : )

Thanks for the patience.

Which defense formation seems to have a greater toll on stamina man to man or zone?

I assume it is man to man... please correct me if I am wrong...
18/11/2011 20:36
  - Div/Gr
Username
2768 msgs.
Best scorer
Man to man marking i suppose, u have run quite a bit to keep them marked 19/11/2011 13:31
  - Div/Gr
3547 msgs.
Best scorer
uhm , neither won't work , use your own strategy . Haha 19/11/2011 13:48
  - Div/Gr
Username
1117 msgs.
International
Uruguay1950 said:
uhm , neither won't work , use your own strategy . Haha



hmm, Uruguay, I do not understand your answer... the question is not about strategy... I believe you need to read questions carefully before you respond : )

it is about how much of a TOLL or DRAIN a 100% zone defense has vs a 100% man to man marking...
19/11/2011 19:43
  - Div/Gr
Username
2768 msgs.
Best scorer
rabioso01 said:
Uruguay1950 said:
uhm , neither won't work , use your own strategy . Haha



hmm, Uruguay, I do not understand your answer... the question is not about strategy... I believe you need to read questions carefully before you respond : )

it is about how much of a TOLL or DRAIN a 100% zone defense has vs a 100% man to man marking...

This is in the Tutorial by Gunner and I guess it is same as in real life situation,

3.3.2 Defence: Zonal Marking vs Man Marking. Man marking is less risky as there is less likelihood of an opposition attacker finding large amounts of space. This may be a good option for a new manager or playing a strong attacking opposition. The drawback of man marking is it can pull your defenders way out of position and tire them out. Zonal marking will keep your defence in a better shape and is probably employed by more experienced managers that have quicker defenders. The drawback of zonal marking is that there is more space for the attacking players, for example - a counter attacking long ball to a CF can leave him through on goal. Somewhere in between is employed by most managers.

Issued solved I think. Link for full tutorial
http://uk.strikermanager.com/foros/hilo.php?id=265474
19/11/2011 19:51
  - Div/Gr
Username
1117 msgs.
International
vijji said:
rabioso01 said:
Uruguay1950 said:
uhm , neither won't work , use your own strategy . Haha



hmm, Uruguay, I do not understand your answer... the question is not about strategy... I believe you need to read questions carefully before you respond : )

it is about how much of a TOLL or DRAIN a 100% zone defense has vs a 100% man to man marking...

This is in the Tutorial by Gunner and I guess it is same as in real life situation,

3.3.2 Defence: Zonal Marking vs Man Marking. Man marking is less risky as there is less likelihood of an opposition attacker finding large amounts of space. This may be a good option for a new manager or playing a strong attacking opposition. The drawback of man marking is it can pull your defenders way out of position and tire them out. Zonal marking will keep your defence in a better shape and is probably employed by more experienced managers that have quicker defenders. The drawback of zonal marking is that there is more space for the attacking players, for example - a counter attacking long ball to a CF can leave him through on goal. Somewhere in between is employed by most managers.

Issued solved I think. Link for full tutorial
http://uk.strikermanager.com/foros/hilo.php?id=265474


again I am not asking wich strategy does what... pls read...

WHICH HAS A GREATER TOLL OR DRAIN ON STAMINA ON THE PLAYERS!!! in other words with which one do they tire faster!?
It is unclear that, "Zonal marking will keep your defence in a better shape" from the above paragraph....

will it keep it in better shape in regards to stamina? or team coherence? in not creating holes?

my question is very simple, which tires out the player more all zone or man to man?
19/11/2011 19:56
  - Div/Gr
Username
2768 msgs.
Best scorer
rabioso01 said:
vijji said:

3.3.2 Defence: Zonal Marking vs Man Marking. Man marking is less risky as there is less likelihood of an opposition attacker finding large amounts of space. This may be a good option for a new manager or playing a strong attacking opposition. The drawback of man marking is it can pull your defenders way out of position and tire them out. Zonal marking will keep your defence in a better shape and is probably employed by more experienced managers that have quicker defenders. The drawback of zonal marking is that there is more space for the attacking players, for example - a counter attacking long ball to a CF can leave him through on goal. Somewhere in between is employed by most managers.

Issued solved I think. Link for full tutorial
http://uk.strikermanager.com/foros/hilo.php?id=265474


again I am not asking wich strategy does what... pls read...

WHICH HAS A GREATER TOLL OR DRAIN ON STAMINA ON THE PLAYERS!!! in other words with which one do they tire faster!?
It is unclear that, "Zonal marking will keep your defence in a better shape" from the above paragraph....

will it keep it in better shape in regards to stamina? or team coherence? in not creating holes?

my question is very simple, which tires out the player more all zone or man to man?

Y don't u read it carefully see the Forth sentence 'The drawback of man marking is it can pull your defenders way out of position and TIRE THEM OUT'.
19/11/2011 19:59
  - Div/Gr
Username
1117 msgs.
International
Thank you for your time...

I don't think that is a definite answer from experience... it is sort of a comment on a certain situation... a comment from a basic tutorial...

not the answer nor the in-depth discussion I am looking for; sorry...
19/11/2011 20:01
  - Div/Gr
Username
2768 msgs.
Best scorer
No that one is true i used greater Man to man marking today n my players r a bit more tired than usual, i guess it was because of that. 19/11/2011 20:04
  - Div/Gr
Username
1117 msgs.
International
kk : )

ya; i am playing around with change of tactics after certain amount of goals- that includes changing my defense...
thank you : )

if anyone has a particular situation which man to man marking took less of a toll on your stamina it would be greatly appreciated to know about it...
lol that is if you want to share... : )
19/11/2011 20:06
  - Div/Gr
     
Go to page 1
1