Go to page 1, 2
| Forum » Suggestions » Stockmarket style school ratings. | Date | |
|---|---|---|
|
Fluctuating value for country rating for schools?
|
||
|
Username
715 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
They should make the country ratings of schools fluctuate with the top 90 Fifa rankings. That way, the ratings of the countries will always be up to date (top 10, 5 stars, 11-20 4.5 stars, 21-30 4.0 stars, etc). And no one would be have an excuse to be frustrated with SM about their country's rating. The price of schools could stay roughly the same this way too. So since S.Korea moved from 29 (Sept) to 31 (Oct) their rating would move from 4.0 stars to 3.5 stars for that month. Hopefully it will go up again next month! The players created in that month would reflect the value of the country at the time the player was created. Denmark moved from 17 to 10 (as it did last month...), their rating would move from 4.5 stars to 5.0 stars. So your school's country would go up and down, just like the stock market. If your country drops off the top 90, the rating just remains at 0.5 stars until it reaches 90th place again  They would have to add quite a few more schools then, but I'm sure many people want that, and the ones who don't will adjust after a few pages of complaints Eventually, many of them might come to like it...Or you could just keep the # of schools the same, but at least have some sort of updating to the ratings that is fair and up to date. It would add a nice element of good "gambling" stock market style, to the game. Think of the added excitement!!! Comments/feedback are welcome. Admins/Devs: Please at least do something http://www.fifa.com/worldranking/rankingtable/index.html Edited by jacobpark 27-10-2011 02:17 |
26/10/2011 05:41 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
797 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
Love that idea. | 26/10/2011 08:29 |
| Union RS Marburg - Div3/Gr9 | ||
|
Username
6256 msgs.
Golden Ball
|
So I spend £90m making an excellent school in brazil and they drop out of the top 10..... No thanks |
26/10/2011 12:30 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
715 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
I doubt Brazil will drop out of the top ten any time soon, and if they do, they'll go back up. That's the nature of stocks. Maybe there could be a bonus for the top 3 schools  (an extra 5 points to avg for each player created, or something). |
26/10/2011 14:29 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
6256 msgs.
Golden Ball
|
Don't think we don't know that this is just a round about way for you to improve the quality of the South Korean school. | 26/10/2011 14:31 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
715 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
LOL, yes, that's the complete reason... Not really, but it's a nice bonus. Gosh... |
26/10/2011 15:09 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
715 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
Just to not PO any people who have invested a lot in schools, but at the same time to allow change. Maybe for the first month, those who have schools move up in rating (to match FIFA's rankings) can pay a fine, or have their country slowly move up in rating (.5 stars a month (or season)) until it's matched to the new rankings. And maybe higher countries that would drop in value, could keep their rating until the country's FIFA rank reaches that rating (going up), then fluctuate with the rating (either up or down). |
28/10/2011 21:49 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
6256 msgs.
Golden Ball
|
Or maybe make South Korea as good as Argentina, despite the fact the best team they beat in the last year was iran? |
28/10/2011 21:54 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
715 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
errr... who is this guy? | 28/10/2011 22:07 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
6256 msgs.
Golden Ball
|
Just a troll. | 28/10/2011 22:08 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
Go to page 1, 2
1
