| Forum » Suggestions » For the economists | Date | |
|---|---|---|
|
Username
4820 msgs.
Best scorer
|
Edited by bluegene 08-09-2011 03:01 |
08/09/2011 02:17 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
2108 msgs.
Best scorer
|
bluegene said: So all the economists out there who didn't got the chance to become the finance minister of their country, use those cobweb covered brains and sheel out some suggestions to curb this rising inflation... P.S. I want this thread to be a serious one. (This is Specially for Hew and Reb) List of Suggestions :- 1. Tax to be imposed on capital gains + Tax slabs 2. Payment of signing bonus = 1 season salary to player on every resign and purchase. 3. Rotation of all 50+ avg free agents in market rather than deleteing after first 3 day auction. Edited by bluegene 07-09-2011 10:33 Edited by bluegene 07-09-2011 12:35 I am honored to be put in such a category. Now as to the limiting the ability to harvest free juniors, I say lets not do it that way, rather decrease the quality of these free juniors enough so that there is a distinct difference between schooled and raw talent, as there would likely be in real life. The other option is to make it less convenient to sell juniors, maybe a you must wait 10 days before reselling anyone acquired for free rule. That seems doable for me. But the limiting of the amount of juniors would only lead to increased demand, which would just end up driving the inflation back up anyway. Please tell me if I'm wrong, business is not my strongest topic. |
08/09/2011 03:49 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
1848 msgs.
International
|
I like bluegene's idea of signing on bonuses. It would get a large chunk of money out of the system, and some teams would maybe think twice about over paying some players like currently happens. Although they could just be signed for a high salary to start with on a 7 year contract so maybe limit the number of years they can be signed for too. Sounds like we're going round and round in circles with this, it'd be interesting to know if this is discussed in the Spanish version too. Where's @Bisho when you need him  |
08/09/2011 04:49 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
1835 msgs.
International
|
hewhoamareismyself Now as to the limiting the ability to harvest free juniors, I say lets not do it that way, rather decrease the quality of these free juniors enough so that there is a distinct difference between schooled and raw talent, as there would likely be in real life. I like this idea. For several reasons, both economic and as mentioned it makes it like real life. Edited by ABC DEFG 08-09-2011 05:24 |
08/09/2011 05:24 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
5205 msgs.
Golden Ball
|
All of the suggestions thus far ignore the simplest rule of inflation: increase supply and prices will decline. The more senior players at high levels of training there are, the lower their price will be. Another truth of econ: reduce the amount of money, and prices go down. One way to help with this would be an exponential decay in release clause. Currently, release clause is calculated simply by a linear function (salary multiplied by a simple number). I.e.: release clause = salary * multiplier You can see this number in the source of the hire page, it's hard-coded in and varies for every player. A better way to calculate release clause would be to vary the multiplier, to make it smaller as the salary increases, for instance: release clause = salary * (multiplier - multiplier * (salary / max salary)) This will have the same effect as an income tax by forcing higher salaries for higher release clauses and be far more palatable since it will be invisible to the naked eye. However, I still think the best way to avoid inflation is to increase supply of the rarer players if their prices start climbing. |
08/09/2011 05:47 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
3363 msgs.
Best scorer
|
All very well but the new simulator throws in some curve balls that could well curb inflation: 1. Players with longer "playing" life spans - so a player will improve to 31 instead of the usual 25/26. This means a lot more attractive players on the market, driving prices down. 2. The "experience" attribute which in turn gives you "Level Up" skills - Young high AV players with very little experience will not command the prices they have been on this simulator. 3. Tactics will play a major factor so a 80 CF for example will not be as effective as he is in this simulator, again driving prices down. 4. This game will eventually have a standard operating league system with promotion and relegation, from Div 1 - 7 and players in the top 3 Divisions will all be roughly the same average. Their experience, skill set and the managers tactics will then come into play. Constant demand for players will diminish. 5. Stadiums will be fully upgraded eventually - no further cash will be coming in. (This will also curb loans as only a certain amount can be loaned) The game will find its equilibrium - give it a chance. Having said all that there will always be some inflation - this is normal and another point - if there are a few "special" players out there (as well as Star Players) I see no problem with a manager who has saved carefully for 2 seasons to snap up a great player for mega millions. It gives that manager immense satisfaction and can only be good for the game. |
08/09/2011 11:26 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
2737 msgs.
Best scorer
|
GunnerNic said: 4. This game will eventually have a standard operating league system with promotion and relegation, from Div 1 - 7 and players in the top 3 Divisions will all be roughly the same average. Their experience, skill set and the managers tactics will then come into play. Constant demand for players will diminish. +10000000000 5. Stadiums will be fully upgraded eventually - no further cash will be coming in. Unless the number of supporters stops increasing at some point, more cash will always be made from stadiums. And that's another point I'm worried about. Once people stop spending on stadiums after they're fully upgraded, and stop spending on schools after they've had excellents everywhere. Don't you think hyperinflation will occur? Because there really isn't much left to spend money on but hostiles. |
08/09/2011 12:34 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
4820 msgs.
Best scorer
|
solirocket said: GunnerNic said: 5. Stadiums will be fully upgraded eventually - no further cash will be coming in. Unless the number of supporters stops increasing at some point, more cash will always be made from stadiums. And that's another point I'm worried about. Once people stop spending on stadiums after they're fully upgraded, and stop spending on schools after they've had excellents everywhere. Don't you think hyperinflation will occur? Because there really isn't much left to spend money on but hostiles. Correct. After the staduims have been fully upgraded only cash will come in with no expenditure. |
08/09/2011 12:51 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
3363 msgs.
Best scorer
|
Agreed the stadium prices will go up for a while, but dont forget that you wont have the increase in spectators like we do now. With the settled league - you wont be winning every game in the higher divisions and winning games is what turns the styles. If you get relegated from Div1 to Div2 - you will have a big drop in spectators. Edited by GunnerNic 08-09-2011 12:58 |
08/09/2011 12:54 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
3363 msgs.
Best scorer
|
bluegene said: Correct. After the staduims have been fully upgraded only cash will come in with no expenditure. Maintenance on a fully upgraded stadium will be very high. |
08/09/2011 12:56 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
3
