| Forum » General » double standard to new comers | Date | |
|---|---|---|
|
Username
11 msgs.
Cadet
|
i am in this game for almost 2 months. how come i can get beaten 3 goals from a team just got a manager today. how come can he have 42 000 seats when i invested on my stadium and work my butt of to pay for it for last 2 months. how come he has players 20/52 when i have it after 2 seasons of playing.. can one of the admins explain this? this issue was brought up before, and i told i will leave if it is not fixed. if i do not get a satisfactory explanation i will leave the game selling all my players and writing on blogs. please explain to me. |
20/04/2011 19:10 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
51 msgs.
Rookie
|
I came across the same situation. Yesterday I had set my team knowing that I was about to play a weak team - 19th in the league with no active manager. The manager sign read 'system bot' till then. Today there was a new manager with an entirely new team playing against me, though the team name remained the same. The team comprised of five 50+ players - among them 3 were near the 55 mark and the other one was about 60. Many of those playing for the last 3 months cannot boast of such a team. The team also had a 42000 seats stadium and I still do not have one even after playing since last February. Again we had to play through the 6th division and only those who were among the leading teams qualified for the higher division. How come one may join the league directly into the 5th division? To be fair to every player, everyone should be starting at the same point. Otherwise the entire game loses its meaning. |
20/04/2011 19:27 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
11 msgs.
Cadet
|
this is the most annoying part of this game, i really need an explanation. the idea of these type of games are progression , what is the point when a new comer becomes much better than us after our 2 months efforts, where is progression in this game? i understand you want to boost he new comer, however by this you lose the old players. I am seriously thinking to quit. shame on the admins.. |
20/04/2011 19:45 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
18 msgs.
Cadet
|
I too thought the issue was resolved, until yesterday when I received an absurdly lowball offer for a junior player of mine. I checked on the manager just to see where he was coming from where he thought that his offer might have been remotely acceptable, and found that he was brand new. On his squad there was a young player in the mid-60's and several in the 50's. Also his stadium was 42,000, but that doesn't bother me nearly as much as the talent on his team. To expect everyone to start with the exact same quality on their team is not required, but the discrepancy here is unreasonable. It takes no more than an active manager and a "starter" team to be competitive in Division 5; there is just no need for new Div. 5 managers to be given such an advantage. |
20/04/2011 19:53 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
64 msgs.
Rookie
|
I have to say, you all have raised valid points. I am really looking forward to what admins have to say about this. And I really really really wanna know how can somebody new directly join in div 5? |
20/04/2011 20:17 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
78 msgs.
Rookie
|
SportySpice said: I too thought the issue was resolved, until yesterday when I received an absurdly lowball offer for a junior player of mine. I checked on the manager just to see where he was coming from where he thought that his offer might have been remotely acceptable, and found that he was brand new. On his squad there was a young player in the mid-60's and several in the 50's. Also his stadium was 42,000, but that doesn't bother me nearly as much as the talent on his team. To expect everyone to start with the exact same quality on their team is not required, but the discrepancy here is unreasonable. It takes no more than an active manager and a "starter" team to be competitive in Division 5; there is just no need for new Div. 5 managers to be given such an advantage. +1. |
20/04/2011 22:15 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
51 msgs.
Rookie
|
I probably need to clarify. When I said that everyone should be starting at the same point I really did not mean 'exactly same quality'. A little bit of variation obviously adds to the spice of the game. But there should at least be a level playing field for all the players. |
21/04/2011 07:06 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
78 msgs.
Rookie
|
Anything from the administrators here? I (and many others) believe this is a major issue, and I'd like to hear from the admins that it gets solved. On another note, can we add two forum categories for bugs and suggestions? The clock is a bug that hasn't been fixed. I haven't heard that this issue has been fixed, and I heard that there was an issue with juniors not returning to youth squad. That's at least 3 issues that haven't been fixed and I haven't heard if or when these issues will be fixed. |
21/04/2011 21:12 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
61 msgs.
Rookie
|
My clock for match/auction/other activity times is accurate, but the current time on top right isn't correct. Juniors are now returning to junior squad. |
21/04/2011 21:57 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
26 msgs.
Child's coach
|
Joy73 said: Today there was a new manager with an entirely new team playing against me, though the team name remained the same. The team comprised of five 50+ players - among them 3 were near the 55 mark and the other one was about 60. Many of those playing for the last 3 months cannot boast of such a team. The team also had a 42000 seats stadium and I still do not have one even after playing since last February. Leave it out i only started with one player above 50 and the rest of them were 47-30. I only joined a month ago. I've upgraded my stadium as well but I didn't start with 42000 seats. Seems a little unfair if older players are getting overtaken by new players. and I'm probably right in assuming that some people didn't start off as well as me if you been playing longer which seems unfair ... |
21/04/2011 22:21 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
1
